Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:47:36.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accurate ab initio Calculations of Methane Dimer Interaction Energies and Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Fluid Methane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Arvin Huang-Te Li
Affiliation:
d93543004@ntu.edu.tw, Institute of Applied Mechanics, Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China
Sheng Der Chao
Affiliation:
sdchao@spring.iam.ntu.edu.tw, Institute of Applied Mechanics, Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China
Get access

Abstract

Intermolecular interaction potentials of the methane dimers have been calculated for 12 symmetric conformations using the Hartree-Fock (HF) self-consistent theory, the second-order M�ller-Plesset (MP2) perturbation theory, and the coupled-cluster with single and double and perturbative triple excitations (CCSD(T)) theory. The HF calculations yield unbound potentials largely due to the exchange-repulsion interaction. In MP2 and CCSD(T) calculations, the basis set effects on the repulsion exponent, the equilibrium bond length, the binding energy, and the asymptotic behavior of the calculated intermolecular potentials have been thoroughly studied. We have employed basis sets from the Slater-type orbitals fitted with Gaussian functions, Pople�s medium size basis sets to Dunning�s correlation consistent basis sets. With increasing basis size, the repulsion exponent and the equilibrium bond length converge at the 6-31G** basis set and the 6-311++G(2d, 2p) basis set, respectively, while a large basis set (aug-cc-pVTZ) is required to converge the binding energy at a chemical accuracy (˜0.01 kcal/mol). We used the BSSE corrected results that systematically converge to the destined potential curve with increasing basis size. The binding energy calculated and the equilibrium bond length using the CCSD(T) method are close to the results at the basis set limit. For molecular dynamics simulation, a 4-site potential model with sites located at the hydrogen atoms was used to fit the ab initio potential data. This model stems from a hydrogen-hydrogen repulsion mechanism to explain the stability of the dimer structure. MD simulations using the ab initio PES show good agreement on both the atom-wise radial distribution functions and the self-diffusion coefficients over a wide range of experimental conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Frenkel, D. and Smit, B., Understanding Molecular Simulations (Academic Press, New York, (2002).Google Scholar
[2] Hayes, J. M.; Greer, J. C.; Morton-Blake, D. A. J. Comp. Chem. 25, 1953 (2004).Google Scholar
[3] Tsuzuki, S.; Uchimaru, T.; Tanabe, K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 287, 327 (1998).Google Scholar
[4] Szczesniak, M. M., Chalasinski, G., Cybulski, S. M., and Scheiner, S., J. Chem. Phys. 93, 4243 (1990).Google Scholar
[5] Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B. et al., Gaussian 03, Revision D.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2004.Google Scholar
[6] Møller, C. and Plesset, M. S., Phys. Rev. 46, 618 (1934).Google Scholar
[7] Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., and Seeger, R., J. Pople, A., J. Chem. Phys. 72, 650 (1980)Google Scholar
[8] Dunning, T. H. Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007 (1989).Google Scholar
[9] Boys, S. F. and Bernardi, F., Mol. Phys. 19, 553 (1970).Google Scholar
[10] Helgaker, T., Klopper, W., Koch, H., and Noga, J., J. Chem. Phys. 106, 9639 (1997).Google Scholar
[11] Martin, J. M. L., Chem. Phys. Lett. 259, 669 (1996).Google Scholar
[12] Feller, D., J. Chem. Phys. 96, 6104 (1992).Google Scholar
[13] Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P., Numerical Recipe in C (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
[14] Chao, S. D., Kress, J. D., and Redondo, A., J. Chem. Phys. 120, 5558 (2004).Google Scholar
[15] Chao, S. D., Kress, J. D., and Redondo, A., J. Chem. Phys. 122, 234912 (2005).Google Scholar
[16] Rapaport, D. C., The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulation (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995).Google Scholar
[17] Jensen, F., Introduction to Computational Chemistry (Wiley, New York, 1999).Google Scholar
[18] Straub, G., Bassen, A., Zweier, H., Bertagnolli, H., Todheide, K., Soper, A. K., and Turner, J., Phys. Rev. E 53, 3505 (1996).Google Scholar