Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:07:15.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Total-System Performance Assessment for the Yucca Mountain Site

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Michael L. Wilson ,
Peter N. Swift ,
Jerry A. McNeish  and
S. David Sevougian
Michael L. Wilson
Affiliation:
Total System Performance Assessment Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0778, U.S.A.
Peter N. Swift
Affiliation:
Total System Performance Assessment Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0778, U.S.A.
Jerry A. McNeish
Affiliation:
Duke Engineering and Services, Inc., 1180 Town Center Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89144, U.S.A.
S. David Sevougian
Affiliation:
Duke Engineering and Services, Inc., 1180 Town Center Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89144, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Yucca Mountain, Nevada, is under consideration as a potential site for a repository for high-level radioactive waste. Total-system performance-assessment simulations are performed to evaluate the safety of the site. Features, events, and processes have been systematically evaluated to determine which ones are significant to the safety assessment. Computer models of the disposal system have been developed within a probabilistic framework, including both engineered and natural components. Selected results are presented for three different total-system simulations, and the behavior of the disposal system is discussed. The results show that risk is dominated by igneous activity at early times, because the robust waste-package design prevents significant nominal (non-disruptive) releases for tens of thousands of years or longer. The uncertainty in the nominal performance is dominated by uncertainties related to waste-package corrosion at early times and by uncertainties in the natural system, most significantly infiltration, at late times.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 713: Symposium JJ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV , 2002 , JJ4.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Total System Performance Assessment for the Site Recommendation, Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management and Operating Contractor (CRWMS M&O) report TDR-WIS-PA-000001 REV 00 ICN 01 (2000).Google Scholar
2. FY01 Supplemental Science and Performance Analyses, Volume 2: Performance Analyses, Bechtel SAIC Company report TDR-MGR-PA-000001 REV 00 (2001).Google Scholar
3.40 CFR Part 197, Public Health and Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, NV; Final Rule, Federal Register 66 (114), 32074–32135 (2001).Google Scholar
4.10 CFR Parts 2, 19, 20, 21, etc., Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Proposed Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada; Final Rule, Federal Register 66 (213), 55732–55816 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Cranwell, R. M., Guzowski, R. V., Campbell, J. E., and Ortiz, N. R., Risk Methodology for Geologic Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Scenario Selection Procedure, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission report NUREG/CR-1667 (1982; revised 1990).Google Scholar
6. Systematic Approaches to Scenario Development (Nuclear Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1992).Google Scholar
7. GoldSim Graphical Simulation Environment, versions 6.04.000, 6.04.007, and 7.17.200 (Golder Associates, Redmond, Washington, 2000, 2001).Google Scholar