Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T13:17:51.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studying Mechanical Properties Of Thin Films Under High Pressures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

B. C. Cai
Affiliation:
On temporary leave from Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P. R. of China
D. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf
Affiliation:
University of Virginia, Dept. of Materials Science, Charlottesville, VA 22901
R. B. Nelson
Affiliation:
University of Virginia, Dept. of Materials Science, Charlottesville, VA 22901
Get access

Abstract

Work-hardening curves of aluminum foils and of stacks of O.1μm thick 22 ct. gold foils, deformed between rotating Bridgman anvils, have been obtained for pressures up to 1533 MPa and shear strains to 400,000%. No sample thickness effect has been found between 5μm and 3μm, nor any significant difference between homogeneous foils and multi-layer foils, but heat-treatments do affect the results, as apparently does the introduction of 50nm thick sputtered copper layers between stacks of gold foils. Increases of strength with pressure appear to be due to corresponding increases of the Peierls-Nabarro stress. X-ray evidence indicates the reorientation of the foils from an initial (001) recrystallization texture after rolling to the (111) texture that was to be expected. Ordinary deformation behavior is indicated throughout, except for a tendency for slight negative work-hardening in the lower pressure range. At the extreme, assuming homogeneous deformation, the foils thinned to 60nm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Peterson, M. B. and Ling, F. F., in Friction and Lubrication in Metal Processing edited by Ling, F.F., Whitely, R.L., Ku, P.M. and Peterson, M.B. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., New York, NY, 1966), pp.3968.Google Scholar
2. Bridgman, P.W., Phys. Rev. 48, 825 (1935).Google Scholar
3. Bridgman, P.W., Proc. Am. Acad. of Arts and Sciences 71, 387 (1937).Google Scholar
4. Towle, L.C., J. Appl. Physics 42, 2368 (1971).Google Scholar
5. Boyd, J. and Robertson, B.P., Trans. ASME 67, 51 (1945).Google Scholar
6. Griggs, D.T., Turner, F.J. and Heard, H.C., Geo. Soc. Am. Memoir 79, 39 (1960).Google Scholar
7. Vereshchagin, F.L. and Shapochkin, V.A., Zhur. Fiz. Metal. i Metalloved 9, 258 (1960).Google Scholar
8. Vereshchagin, F.L., Zubova, E.V. and Shapochkin, V.A., Pribory i Tekhn. Eksperim. 5, 83 (1960).Google Scholar
9. Riecker, R.E., Rev. Sci. Inst. 35, 596 (1964).Google Scholar
10. Bridgman, P.W., Proc. Am. Acad. Arts and Sciences 81, 165 (1951).Google Scholar
11. Riecker, R.E. and Towle, L.C., J. Appl. Physics 38, 5189 (1967).Google Scholar
12. Towle, L.C. and Riecker, R.E., J. Appl. Physics 39, 4807 (1968).Google Scholar
13. Towle, L.C. and R.E. Riecker 163, 41 (1969).Google Scholar
14. Towle, L.C., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26, 569 (1965).Google Scholar
15. Towle, L.C., J. Appl. Physics 37, 4475 (1966).Google Scholar
16. Towle, L.C., Science 159, 629 (1968).Google Scholar
17. Riecker, R.E., Towle, L.C. and Rooney, T.P., Air Force Cambridge Res. Lab. Rept. 67–0475, (1967).Google Scholar
18. Cai, B.C., Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, D. and Nelson, R.B., to be published.Google Scholar
19. Cai, B.C., Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, D. and Nelson, R.B., Mater. Sci. Eng., in the press.Google Scholar
20. Wong, C.G., Johnson, W.L. and Cotts, E.J., J. Mater. Res. 5, 488 (1990).Google Scholar
21. De Avillez, R.R., Clevenger, L.A., Thompson, C.V. and Tu, K.N., J. Mater. Res., 5, 593 (1990).Google Scholar
22. de Jong, A.F. and Jannsen, K.T.F., J. Mater. Res. 5, 578 (1990).Google Scholar
23. Jesser, W.A. and Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, D., Mater. Sci. Eng. 9, 111 (1972).Google Scholar
24. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, D., phys. stat. sol. (a) 47, 639 (1978).Google Scholar
25. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf, D., Acta Met. 37, 3217 (1989).Google Scholar