Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:55:52.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress Evolution in Ultra Thin Sputtered Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Quanmin Su
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Nuclear Engineering, University of Maryland, 20742- 2115, USA
R. C. Cammarata
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
Manfred Wuttig
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Nuclear Engineering, University of Maryland, 20742- 2115, USA
Get access

Abstract

The stress and microstructure of growing thin films evolve with time if the deposition is interrupted or terminated. To establish the parameters which control both kinetic processes ultra thin Au, Cu and Al layers were sputter deposited on Si membranes and the stress evolution was monitored by a vibrating membrane technique. The related surface morphology was studied by scanning tunneling microscopy. Aging after each deposition causes stress evolution towards higher tension and the evolution of the stress with time follows an exponential law with a characteristic relaxation time of the order of tens of seconds. This time was found to depend strongly on the accumulated film thickness as well as the surface morphology. The intrinsic stress of the growing layer increases with the coverage of the film on substrate. Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) shows that the film grows in a Volmer-Weber (VW) mode and the stress reaches a maximum as the film become continuous.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Koch, R., Winau, D. and Rieder, K.-H., Physica Scripta, T49B, 539 (1993)Google Scholar
2. Windishmann, H., Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Science, 17, 547 (1992)Google Scholar
3. Thornton, John A. and Hoffman, D. W., Thin Solid Films, 171, 5 (1989)Google Scholar
4. Abermann, R., Vacuum, 41, 1279 (1990)Google Scholar
5. Koch, R., Winau, D., Füjhrmann, A. and Rieder, K. H., Vacuum, 43, 521 (1992)Google Scholar
6. Koch, R., Winau, D., Führmann, A. and Rieder, K. -H., Phys. Rev., 44B, 3369 (1991)Google Scholar
7. Su, Q. and Wuttig, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 3437 (1993)Google Scholar
8. Fartash, A., Schuller, I. K. and Grimsditch, M., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 4244 (1992)Google Scholar
9. Wah, T., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 275 (1962)Google Scholar
10. Abermann, R. and Koch, R., Thin Solid Films 66, 217 (1980)Google Scholar
11. Laugier, M., Vacuum 31,155 (1981)Google Scholar
12. Cammarata, R. C., Prog. Surf. Sci. 46, 1 (1994)Google Scholar
13. Nowick, A. S. and Berry, B. S., Anelastic Relaxation in Crystalline Solids, Academic Press, 1972 Google Scholar
14. Su, Quanmin, Wuttig, Manfred, Kinard, J., Novotny, D. and Huang, D. X., Symposium B2, MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, 1994 Google Scholar
15. Kurt J. Lesker Sputtering Super System IIIGoogle Scholar
16. VIBRAN Technologies, Inc.Google Scholar
17. Su, Q. and Wuttig, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 3437 (1993)Google Scholar
18. Su, Quanmin, Bailly, Cecile, Wuttig, Manfred, Corcoran, Sean and Sieradski, Karl, Symposium B2, MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, 1994 Google Scholar
19. Cammarata, R. C., Prog. Surf. Sci. 46, 1 (1994)Google Scholar
20. Su, Quanmin, Bailly, Cecile, Wuttig, Manfred, Corcoran, Sean and Sieradski, Karl, Symposium B2, MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, 1994 Google Scholar