Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T05:43:38.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Steady-State Model for Coupled Defect Impurity Diffusion in Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

F. F. Morehead  and
R. F. Lever
F. F. Morehead
Affiliation:
IBM East Fishkill Facility, Hopewell Junction, New York 12533
R. F. Lever
Affiliation:
IBM East Fishkill Facility, Hopewell Junction, New York 12533
Get access

Abstract

We extend our earlier model which was proposed to explain tails in the diffusion profiles of high concentration boron and phosphorus in silicon. Our quasi-steady-state approach is generalized here to include both vacancies (V) and interstitials (I) at equivalent levels. I-V recombination is regarded as near local equilibrium, occurring through reactions of the defects with defect-impurity pairs. This approach leads to the well-known plateau, kink and tail in high surface concentration P diffusions in Si and to the less well recognized tails in B as well. Our extended model, in its simplest form, allows a more complete and less restrictive treatment of Au diffusion in Si. An important advantage is the direct inclusion of these defect-impurity interactions and the resulting gradients in the defect concentrations.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 163: Symposium G – Impurities, Defects and Diffusion in Semiconductors: Bulk and Layered Structures , 1989 , 561
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Morehead, F.F. and Lever, R.F., Appl. Phys. Lett.,151 (1986).Google Scholar
2 Mulvaney, B.J. and Richardson, W.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 1917 (1987).Google Scholar
3 Orlowski, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53,1323 (1988).Google Scholar
4 Richardson, W. B. and Mulvaney, B. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1917(1988).Google Scholar
5 Morehead, F., Mater.Res.Soc.Proc. 104, 99(1988).Google Scholar
6 Morehead, F.F. and Lever, R.F., unpublished.Google Scholar
7 Hu, S.M., J.Appl.Phys. 57,1069 (1985).Google Scholar
8 Mathiot, D. and Pfister, J.C., J.Appl.Phys. 55, 3518 (1984).Google Scholar
9 Rorris, E.,O’Brien, R.R.,Morehead, F.F.,Lever, R.F.,Peng, J.P. and Srinivasan, G.R., unpublished.Google Scholar
10 Lever, R.F. and Morehead, F.F., unpublished.Google Scholar
11 Gösele, U., Morehead, F.F.,Frank, W. and Seeger, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 38,157(1981).Google Scholar
12 Since Eq(l9c) was used to analyze Au and Pt in-diffusion profiles in Ref.(5) to obtain an estimate of DI while an alternate expression (see text) may be equally valid (or invalid), the estimate given in Ref. (5) for the diffusivity of interstitial Si may equally well be that of the interstitial Au.Google Scholar
13 Stolwijk, N.A., Hölzel, J., Frank, W., Weber, E.R. and Mehrer, H., Appl. Phys. A 39, 37(1986).Google Scholar
14 Orr Arienzo, W.A.,Glang, R.,Lever, R.F.,Lewis, R.K. and Morehead, F.F., J.Appl.Phys. 63, 116(1988).Google Scholar
15 Orlowski, M., IEDM 1988 Technical Digest,(Prodeedings of the Dec. 1988 meeting, International Electron Devices, San Francisco), p. 632.Google Scholar