Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:23:09.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Size-Related Plasticity Effects in AFM Silicon Cantilever Tips*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Malgorzata Kopycinska-Mueller
Affiliation:, NIST, MRD, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado, 80305, United States, 303 496 4625
Roy H. Geiss
Affiliation:, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials Reliability Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado, 80305, United States
Donna C. Hurley
Affiliation:, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials Reliability Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado, 80305, United States
Get access


We are developing dynamic atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques to determine nanoscale elastic properties. Atomic force acoustic microscopy (AFAM) makes use of the resonant frequencies of an AFM cantilever while its tip contacts the sample surface at a given static load. Our methods involve nanosized silicon probes with tip radius R ranging from approximately 10 nm to 150 nm. The resulting radius of contact between the tip and the sample is less than 20 nm. However, the contact stress can be greater than a few tens of GPa, exceeding the theoretical yield strength of silicon by a factor of two to four. Our AFAM experiments indicate that, contrary to expectation, tips can sometimes withstand such stresses without fracture. We subjected ten tips to the same sequence of AFAM experiments. Each tip was brought into contact with a fused quartz sample at different static loads. The load was systematically increased from about 0.4 μN to 6 μN. Changes in tip geometry were observed in images acquired in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) between the individual AFAM experiments. All of the tips with R < 10 nm broke during the first AFAM experiments at static loads less than 1.6 μN. Tips with R > 40 nm plastically deformed under such loads. However, a group of tips with R from 25 nm to 30 nm neither broke nor deformed during the tests. In order to reach higher contact stresses, two additional tips with similar values of R were used in identical experiments on nickel and sapphire samples. Although the estimated stresses exceeded 40 GPa, we did not observe any tip fracture events. Our qualitative observations agree with more systematic studies performed by other groups on various nanostructures. The results emphasize the necessity of understanding the mechanics of nanometer-scaled bodies and the impact of size effects on measurements of mechanical properties on such scales.

Research Article
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Contribution of NIST, an agency of the US government; not subject to copyright.


1. Yamanaka, K., Noguchi, A., Tsuji, T., Koike, T., and Goto, T., Surf. Inter. Anal. 27, 600 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Cuberes, M. T., Assender, H. E., Briggs, G. A. D., and Kolosov, O. L., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 33, 2347 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Rabe, U. et al., Ultrasonics 38, 430 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Johnson, K. L., Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 1985) p. 92.Google Scholar
5. Ruoff, A. L., J. Appl. Phys. 50, 3354 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Kopycinska-Mûller, M., Geiss, R. H., and Hurley, D. C., Ultramicroscopy 2006, in print.Google Scholar
7. Simmons, G. and Wang, H., Single crystal elastic constants and calculated aggregate properties: A handbook (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971) p.56.Google Scholar
8. Gerberich, W. W. et al., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 51, 979 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Greer, J. R., Oliver, W. C., and Nix, W. D., Acta Mater. 53, 1821 (2005).Google Scholar
10. Zhou, Y., Erb, U., Aust, K. T., and Palumbo, G., Scripta Mater. 48, 825 (2003).Google Scholar