Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T10:02:32.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy Investigation of the Strained Si1−xGex-on-Si Band Offsets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Xiangdong Chen
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 78712
Xiang-Dong Wang
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 78712
Kou-Chen Liu
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 78712
Dong-Won Kim
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 78712
Sanjay Banerjee
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 78712
Get access

Abstract

The band offsets and band gap are the most important parameters that determine the electrical and optical behavior of a heterojunction. In situscanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) was employed to measure the valence band offset of strained Si1−xGex-on-Si (100) for the first time. The valence band offsets of strained Si0.77Ge0.23and Si0.59Ge0.41on Si(100) are found to be 0.21eV and 0.36eV, respectively. The results are in good agreement with theory and with results from other experimental methods. Due to band bending and surface states, it is difficult to determine the conduction band edge at the interface of Si1−xGex/Si exactly, but the conduction band offset is found to be much smaller than the valence band offset

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Wang, K. L., Thomas, S. G., and Tanner, M. O., Journal of Materials: Materials in Electronics 6, 311 (1995).Google Scholar
(2) Wang, K. L., and Karunasiri, R. P. G., J. Vac. Sci. technol. B 11(3), 1159(1993).Google Scholar
(3) Walle, Chris G. Van de and Martin, Richard M, Phys. rev. B 34(8), 5621(1986).Google Scholar
(4) Brighten, J. C., Hawkins, I. D., Peaker, A. R., Parkerand, E. H. C., and Whall, T. E., J. Appl. Phys. 74(3), 1894 (1993).Google Scholar
(5) Kim, M, and Osten, H. J., Appl. Phys. lett. 70(20), 2702(1997).Google Scholar
(6) Khorram, S, Chem, C. H., and Wang, K. L., Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. 220, 181(1991).Google Scholar
(7) Feenstra, R. M., Phys. Rev. B, 50(7), 4561(1994).Google Scholar
(8) Feenstra, R. M., Phys. Rev. B, 44(24), 13791(1991)Google Scholar
(9) Feenstra, R.M. and Stroscio, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 5, 923(1987).Google Scholar
(10) Lang, D. V., People, R, Bean, J. C., and Sergent, A. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 1333(1985).Google Scholar