Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T02:23:58.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Roll-to-roll manufacture of pentacene-based thin film transistors with a flash-evaporated polymer dielectric cured with an e-beam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2011

Gamal A. W. Abbas
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, 16 Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
Donna Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, 16 Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
Kanad Mallik
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, 16 Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
Hazel E. Assender
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, 16 Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

We report our fabrication of pentacene field effect transistors (FETs) based on a vacuum processed and e-beam cured polymer electrolyte (i.e., tripropylene glycol diacrylate (TRPGDA)) as a gate dielectric layer on flexible wide web substrates. The deposition of the semiconductor and gate insulator layers is carried out in Oxford's roll-to-roll vacuum web processing facility and could be combined in-line with roll-to-roll pattern metallization. The aim of the work is to demonstrate the ability to create all-evaporated transistors, exploiting the kind of technologies at present extensively used in the food packaging industry, for example, in which all layers can be deposited at high web speeds. Ours is a room temperature and a solvent-free method with an ultrahigh deposition rate (web speeds in excess of 100 m/min are possible).

The performance of the pentacene and the polymer dielectric materials within devices was investigated, demonstrating (1) the ability to deposit good quality pentacene layers in the roll-to-roll environment and (2) the importance of the e-beam curing conditions of the dielectric layer on the performance of the organic FET devices. This deposition route creates a smooth, pin-hole-free dielectric layer as it is deposited onto the substrate as a monomeric liquid, before curing, and there is no mass-loss such as in solvent-based deposition processes. These devices have a 250 μm channel length and an aspect ratio of 16. No self-assembled monolayer (SAM) or other surface modification had been applied to the insulator layer to achieve these properties.

The tuning of the transistors' operating voltage and output characteristics was feasible through the ease of control of the polymer dielectric thickness achieving a threshold voltage of less than 10 V. On/off ratio in excess of 103, and mobility = 0.1 cm2V-1s-1 have been achieved.

The ability to integrate such a high deposition rate polymer process, into a single step, multilayer, vacuum deposition process with conventional vacuum deposition sources provides a possible route to low cost and large area electronic device processing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dimitrakopoulos, C. D. and Malenfant, P. R. L., Adv. Mater. 14, 99 (2002).Google Scholar
2. Mattox, D. M. and Mattox, V. H., “50 Years of Vacuum Coating Technology and the growth of the Society of Vacuum Coaters”, (Society of Vacuum Coaters 2007) pp 3286.Google Scholar
3. Affinito, J., Martin, P., Gross, M., Coronado, C. and Greenwell, E., Thin Solid Films 270, 43 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Affinito, J. D., Surface and Coatings Technology 133134, 528 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Lange, J. and Wyser, Y., Packaging Technology and Science 16, 149 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Henry, B.M., Topping, A.J., Searle, A., Assender, H.E., Grovenor, C.R.M., Creatore, M. and van de Sanden, M.C.M., Proceedings of the Annual Technical Conference – Society of Vacuum Coaters 50, 700 (2007).Google Scholar
7. Wang, W., Shi, J., Jiang, W., Guo, S., Zhang, H., Quan, B. and Ma, D., Microelectronics Journal 38 27 (2007).Google Scholar
8. Mohapatra, S., Grigas, M., Wenz, R., Rotzoll, R., Olariu, V., Shchekin, O., Dimmler, K. and Dodabalapur, A. MRS Proc Spring 870E H3.2 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Dimitraopoulos, C.D., Brown, A.R. and Pomp, A., J. Appl. Phys 80 2501 (1996).Google Scholar