Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T09:20:36.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Developments in Simulating Grain Growth with Monte Carlo Algorithms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Qiang Yu  and
Sven K. Esche
Qiang Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030
Sven K. Esche
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030
Get access

Abstract

Both isotropic and anisotropic single-phase grain growth processes modeled using a modified Monte Carlo method exhibit parabolic growth kinetics, and the anisotropy degree affects only the rate of change of the mean grain area. In some cases, with significantly anisotropic grain boundary energies, the normalized grain size distributions are not time-invariant during the lattice evolution.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 731: Symposium W – Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Materials Behavior and Evolution , 2002 , W6.11
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Humphreys, F. J., Modelling Simul. Mat. Sci. Eng. 8, 893 (2000).Google Scholar
2 Holm, E. A. and Battaile, C. C., JOM 53, 20 (2001).Google Scholar
3 Atkinson, H. V., Acta Metall. 36, 469 (1988).Google Scholar
4 Anderson, M. P., Srolovitz, D. J., Grest, G. S., and Sahni, P. S., Acta Metall. 32, 783 (1984).Google Scholar
5 Radhakrishnan, B. and Zacharia, T., Metall. Mater. Trans. A26, 167 (1995).Google Scholar
6 Grest, G. S., Anderson, M. P., and Srolovitz, D. J., Phys. Rev. B38, 4752 (1988).Google Scholar
7 Song, X. Y., Liu, G. Q., and He, Y. Z., Prog. Nat. Sci. 8, 92 (1998).Google Scholar
8 Grest, G. S., Srolovitz, D. J., and Anderson, M. P., Acta Metall. 33, 509 (1985).Google Scholar
9 Holm, E. A., Hassold, G. N., and Miodownik, M. A., Acta Mater. 49, 2981 (2001).Google Scholar
10 Yu, Q. and Esche, S. K., submitted for publication in Comp. Mater. Sci., (2002).Google Scholar
11 Yu, Q. and Esche, S. K., accepted for publication in Mater. Lett., (2002).Google Scholar
12 Yu, Q. and Esche, S. K., submitted for publication in Modelling Simul. Mat. Sci. Eng., (2002).Google Scholar
13 Holm, E. A., Zacharopoulos, N., and Srolovitz, D. J., Acta Mater. 46, 953 (1998).Google Scholar
14 Mullins, W. W. and Vinals, J., Acta Metall. 37, 991 (1989).Google Scholar