Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T06:12:03.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reactions Controlling Äspö Groundwater Chemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Allan T. Emrén*
Affiliation:
Nuclear Chemistry, Materials and Surface Chemistry, Chalmers Univ. of Technology, SE-41296 Göteborg, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Samples of groundwater are often found to be close to saturation with respect to some minerals. A common approach to modelling of groundwater chemistry is to assume that such minerals control some chemical property of the groundwater. As an example, calcite is often supposed to control the pH value (in addition to concentrations of calcium and carbonate). Here, three models have been used to investigate the control of chemical properties of a groundwater from the Äspö site at the Swedish East Coast.

In the first model, a set of minerals has been selected, in which all minerals are close to saturation with respect to the groundwater. Then an attempt has been made to model formation of the groundwater from rain by letting PHREEQE equilibrate the rain with the minerals.

The second model is similar, but the mineral set used is similar to the one observed at Äspö, and includes also minerals that are far from saturation. To handle the complex situation with numerous minerals and spatial variability, the CRACKER program was used to simulate formation of groundwater from rain.

In the third model, the CRACKER program has been used with the observed groundwater. In the simulation, the water has been disturbed locally, and the relaxation of water chemistry has been studied.

Results from all three kinds of models show that no conclusions on regulation of chemical properties in groundwater can be drawn from saturation properties of minerals. Rather, most properties are controlled by complicated interactions, including spatial variability, irreversible reactions and mixing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stumm, W., and Morgan, J. J., “Aquatic Chemistry“, 2nd ed., 780 pp(1981)Google Scholar
2. Shock, E. L., Nature 368, 499500 (1994)Google Scholar
3. Grenthe, I., Stumm, W., Laaksoharju, M., Nilsson, A. C., and Wikberg, P., Chemical Geology 98, 131150 (1992)Google Scholar
4. Emrén, A. T., “Mechanisms for Redox Control and Their Effects Upon Modelled Properties of Äspö Groundwaters“, Proc. International Conference on Deep Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste, (AECL, 1996) 4962 Google Scholar
5. Bond, K. A., Moreton, A. D., and Heath, T. G., “HATCHES 5.0 - The HARWELL/NIREX Database“, Harwell Laboratory (1992)Google Scholar
6. Lundén, I., “Geochemical Modelling of Groundwater Chemistry in the Vicinity of a Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel“, Ph. D. Thesis 147 pp(1992)Google Scholar
7. Grimaud, D., Beaucaire, C., and Michard, G., Applied Geochemistry 5, 515525 (1990)Google Scholar
8. Emrén, A. T., Computers & Geosciences 24, 753763 (1998)Google Scholar
9. Tullberg, E-L., Wallin, B., and Landström, O., “Hydrogeochemical studies of fracture minerals from water conducting fractures and deep groundwaters at Äspö“, SKB Progress Report 25–90–01 84 pp(1991)Google Scholar
10. Tullborg, E-L., Personal communication.Google Scholar
11. Tirén, S., Personal communication.Google Scholar