Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T07:39:38.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonlinear magneto-optics of nanogranular films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Evgenia M. Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia;
Tatyana V Murzina
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia;
Oleg A Aktsipetrov
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia;
Anatolii F. Kravets
Affiliation:
Institute of Magnetism, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, the results of experimental studies of magnetization-induced second- and third-order nonlinear optical effects in magnetic nanogranular films are described. Magnetization-induced variations of the intensity, polarization state and the phase of the harmonics' waves are observed in magnetic nanogranular films of the composition CoxAg1-x and Cox(Al2O3)1-x. Nonlinear magneto-optical Kerr effect (NOMOKE) in third-harmonic generation is observed in these nanomaterials. The second- and third-order NOMOKE from granular films is shown to exceed the linear magneto-optical Kerr effect by at least an order of magnitude.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Heinz, T. F., “Second-order nonlinear optical effects at surfaces and interfaces,”; in Nonlinear Surface Electromagnetic Phenomena, Ponath, H.-E. and Stegeman, G. I., eds. (North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1991), pp. 355416;Google Scholar
2. Aktsipetrov, O.A., Elyutin, P.V., Fedyanin, A.A., Nikulin, A.A., and Rubtsov, A.N., Surf. Sci. 325, 343355 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Shen, Y. R., The Principles of Nonlinear Optics (Wiley, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
4. Pan, Ru-Pin, Wie, H.D., and Shen, Y.R., Phys. Rev. B 39, 12291234 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Bennemann, K.H., J. Mag. Mag. Mat. 200, 679705 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Murzina, T.V., Misuryaev, T.V., Kravets, A.F., Güdde, J., Schuhmacher, D., Marowsky, G., Nikulin, A.A., and Aktsipetrov, O.A., Surf. Sci. 482/485, 11011106 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Stolle, R., Marowsky, G., Schwarzberg, E., Berkovic, G., Appl. Phys. B, 63, 491 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Kravets, V. G., Bozec, D., Matthew, J. A. D., Thompson, S. M., Menard, H., Horn, A. B., Kravets, A. F., Phys. Rev. B 65, 054415054424 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Aktsipetrov, O.A., Gan'shina, E.A., Guschin, V.S., Misuryaev, T.V., Murzina, T.V., JMMM 80, 196 (1999).Google Scholar