Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:31:09.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NMR Study on the Nanostructure of Co/X multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

W. J. M. De Jonge
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology (EUT), 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
H. A. M. De Gronckel
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology (EUT), 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
K. Kopinga
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology (EUT), 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
P. Panissod
Affiliation:
IPCMS, 4 rue Blaise Pascal., 67070 Strasbourg, France
F. J. A. Den Broeder
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories, 5600 JA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The nanostructure and local strain of \111] FCC Co/Cu and Co/Ni multilayers is studied by means of nuclear magnetic resonance. The atomic topology of the interface can be deduced from the NMR spectrum, the local strains from the shift in the hyperfine fields. The results show that the Co/Cu interface is a mixed monolayer and that the Co layers, including the interface, have uniform (tensile) strain inversely proportional to the Co thickness (within experimental error) with the proportionality constant depending on the Cu thickness. In Co/Ni the interface consists of two mixed layers and the Co layers have uniform compressive strain inversely proportional to the Co thickness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Garcia, P. J., Meinhaldt, A. D. and Suna, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 178 (1985); F. J. A. den Broeder, H. C. Donkersloot, H. J. G. Draaisma and W. J. M. de Jonge, J. Appl. Phys. 61, 4317 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Baibich, M. N., Broto, J. M., Fert, A., Dau, F. Nguyen Van, Petroff, F., Etienne, P., Creuzet, G., Friederich, A. and Chazelas, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 206 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Dürr, W., Taborelli, M., Paul, O., Germar, R., Gudat, W., Pescia, D. and Landolt, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 206 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Broeder, F. J. A. den, Kuiper, D., Mosselaer, A. P. van de and Hoving, W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2769 (1988); B. Heinrich, K. B. Urquhart, A. S. Arrott, J. F. Cochran, K. Myrtle and S. T. Purcell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1756 (1987); M. Stampanoni, A. Vaterlaus, M. Aeschlimann and F. Meier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2483 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gronckel, H. A. M. de, Kopinga, K., Jonge, W. J. M. de, Panissod, P., Schillé, J. P. and Broeder, F. J. A. den, to be published in Phys. Rev.Google Scholar
6. Gronckel, H. A. M. de, Swüste, C. H. W., Kopinga, K. and Jonge, W. J. M. de, Appl. Phys. A49, 467 (1989); Ht. A. M. de Gronckel, J. A. M. Bienert, F. J. A. den Broeder and W. J. M. de Jonge, Proc. of the EMRS Spring Meeting 1990, may 29- june 1, Strasbourg (3. M. M. M., in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Lamelas, F.J., Lee, C. H-., He, Hui, Vavra, W. and Clarke, R., Phys Rev. B40, 5837 (1989); K. Le Dang, P. Veillet, Hui Hie, F. J. Lamelas, C. H. Lee and R. Clarke, Phys. Rev. B41, 12902 (1990); C. H. Lee, Hui He, F. J. Lamelas, W. Vavra, C. Uher and R. Clarke, Phys. Rev. B42, 1066 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Nasu, S., Yasuoka, H., Nakamura, Y. and Murakami, Y., Acta Metall. 22, 1057 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Jones, R. V. and Kaminov, I. P., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 5, 175 (1960); D. H. Anderson and G. A. Samara, J. Appl. Phys. 35, 3043 (1964); J. F. Janak, Phys. Rev. B21, 2206 (1979).Google Scholar
10. Franck, F. C. and Merwe, J. H. van der, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A198, 216 (1949); C. Chappert and P. Bruno, J. Appl. Phys. 64, 5736 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Huberman, M. L. and Grimsditch, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1403 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Jankowski, A. F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1892 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar