Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T03:40:19.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure and Optoelectronic Properties of CdSe-Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

U. Klement
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Seestrasse 92, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
F. Ernst
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Seestrasse 92, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
Get access

Abstract

CdSe appears to be a promising material to replace amorphous hydrogenated silicon as the photosensitive part in the retina of the “Electronic Eye”, a camera based on thin film technique. We have investigated the influence of post-depositional annealing treatments with respect to the optimization of the photoconductive properties. TEM-, AFM- and XPS-measurements on CdSe thin films are reported. The formation of an oxide could not be detected by XPS-depth profiling of films annealed in air but chemisorption of oxygen is expected at the intergrain boundaries. Hence, high potential barriers for electron transport will be introduced. Under illumination, trapping of photo-generated holes will neutralize the charge at the intergrain boundaries leading to improved electric properties. However, the homogeneity of the photoconductive properties in CdSe is not yet satisfying. The formation of swellings and holes on the sample surface, found by AFM-measurements, can perhaps explain the inhomogeneity of the photoconductive properties. Using Si wafers as substrate material no improvement in texturing could be reached, since an amorphous CdSe-interlayer is formed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Horst, D., Lüder, E., Habibi, M., Kallfass, T. and Siegorder, J., in Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Thin Film Transistors Technologies, Miami Beach 1994, Electrochemical Society, Inc., Vol. 94–35, pp. 381391.Google Scholar
2. Klement, U., Horst, D. and Ernst, F. in Advances in Microcrystalline and Nanocrystalline Semiconductors - 1996. edited by Collins, R.W., Fauchet, P.M., Shimizu, I., Vial, J.-C., Shimada, T., Alivisatos, A.P. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 452, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997), pp. 925930.Google Scholar
3. Van Calster, A., Vervaet, A., De Rycke, I., De Baets, J. and Vanfleteren, J., Journal of Crystal Growth 86, 924(1988).Google Scholar
4. Spachmann, J., Lüder, E., Kallfaβ, T. and Otterbach, W., in Polvcrystalline Semiconductors, Springer Proceedings in Physics, Vol. 35, eds.: Werner, J.H., Möller, H.J. and Strunk, H.P. (Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989), pp. 262267.Google Scholar
5. Heek, H.F., Solid State Electronics, Vol. 11, 459 (1968).Google Scholar
6. Green, M.A., Solar Cells: Operating Principles, Technology and System Application, Series in Solid State Electronics, (Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New York 1982), p. 188.Google Scholar
7. Mickelsen, R.A. in Polvcrystalline and Amorphous Thin-Films and Devices, Materials Science Series, ed.: Kazmerski, L.L. (Academic Press, New York, 1980), pp. 209227.Google Scholar
8. Perkin Elmer ESCA Instruction Manual (1990).Google Scholar
9. Chan, D.S.H. and Hill, A.E., Thin Solid films 35, 337 (1976).Google Scholar
10. Oduor, A.O. and Gould, R.D., Thin Solid films 270, 387 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Raoult, F., Fortin, B. and Colin, Y., Thin Solid films 182, 1 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Nair, M.T.S., Nair, P.K., Zingaro, R.A. and Meyers, E.A., J. Appl. Phys 74, 1879 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Garcia, V.M., Nair, M.T.S., Nair, P.K. and Zingaro, R.A., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 10, 427 (1995).Google Scholar