Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T05:34:07.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interpretation of Resistance Changes during Interconnect Reliability Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

John E. Sanchez Jr
Affiliation:
Advanced Micro Devices, Integrated Device Technology Division, Sunnyvale, CA, 94088
Van Pham
Affiliation:
Advanced Micro Devices, Integrated Device Technology Division, Sunnyvale, CA, 94088
Get access

Abstract

Accelerated reliability testing of VLSI layered metallizations involves monitoring the resistance of interconnect test structures under the assumption that changes in the resistance are due to processes (i.e., damage) which are induced by the test conditions (current and/or temperature.) “Failure” of the interconnect is defined as a somewhat arbitrary increase in fractional resistance ΔR/Ro ≈ +10% to +30%, where Ro is the initial resistance. However interpretation of the measured ΔR/Ro (both positive and negative) is complicated by other processes, the test conditions, and the test structure itself which all contribute to ΔR/Ro. We estimate the magnitude of intrinsic factors, such as vacancies and solute effects, as well as extrinsic factors, such as interconnect strain and voiding, on measured on ΔR/Ro. We also show that localized joule heating at voids (a mixed intrinsic + extrinsic effect) principally accounts for the large ΔR/Ro measured during electromigration (i.e., high current) testing. These results suggest improved methods for the detection of interconnect voids induced by the stresses of passivation confinement. We outline the considerations which allow for more rigorous failure criteria which are scalable to any metallization layer scheme, interconnect length and test condition. Finally, we discuss the interpretation of resistance changes at interlevel via structures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1) Vaidya, S., Sinha, A.K., Thin Solid Films 75, 253 (1981).Google Scholar
2) Simmons, R.O., Balluffi, R.W., Physical Review 117 (1), 52 (1960)Google Scholar
3) Simmons, R.O., Balluffi, R.W., Physical Review 117 (1), 62 (1960)Google Scholar
4) Moeckl, U.E., Lloyd, J.R., Arzt, E. in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics III, edited by Rodbell, K., Filter, W., Frost, H., and Ho, P., (Materials Research Society Proc. 309, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) pp. 301306.Google Scholar
5) Kim, C., Selitser, S.I., Morris, J.W. Jr, J. Applied Physics 75 (2), 879 (1994)Google Scholar
6) Venkatrkrishnan, S.N., Ficalora, P.J. in Stress-Induced Phenomena in Metallization, edited by Li, C.-Y., Totta, P., and Ho, P., (American Institute of Physics Conf. Proc. 263, New York, NY, 1992) pp. 236249.Google Scholar
7) Sanchez, J.E. Jr, McKnelly, L.T., Morris, J.W. Jr, J. Electronic Materials 19 (11), 1213 (1990).Google Scholar