Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-rcd7l Total loading time: 0.314 Render date: 2021-10-24T16:48:54.267Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Improved Autoadhesion Measurement Method for Micromachined Polysilicon Beams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Maarten P. de Boer
Affiliation:
Surface and Interface Science, Dept. 1114, Mail Stop 1413, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185 (mpdebo@sandia.gov)
Terry A. Michalske
Affiliation:
Surface and Interface Science, Dept. 1114, Mail Stop 1413, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185 (mpdebo@sandia.gov)
Get access

Abstract

We have measured autoadhesion (e.g. stiction) of individual polysilicon beams by interferometric optical microscopy. Untreated cantilever beams were dried from water in air, while treated beams were coated with a hydrophobic molecular coating of octadecyltrichlorosilane (ODTS). Adhesion values obtained for beams adhered to the substrate over a long length (large d) are independent of beam length with values of 16.7 and 4.4 mJ/m2 for untreated and treated samples respectively. These values can be understood in terms of differences in surface chemistry and polysilicon roughness. Using the shortest length beam which remains attached to the substrate, adhesion values were 280 and 16 mJ/m2 respectively. These higher values may be a result of capillarity effects. We recommend that measurements be made on beams in which d is large, in contrast to the current practice of noting the shortest beam adhered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mastrangelo, C. H. and Tang, W. C., Semiconductor Sensors, Sze, S. M., Ed., 70 (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994).Google Scholar
2. Alley, R. L., Cuan, G. J., Howe, R. T. and Komvopoulos, K., Proc. IEEE Solid-State Sensor & Actuator Workshop (Hilton Head), 202 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Alley, R, L., Mai, P., Komvopoulos, K. and Howe, R. T., Proc. Int. Conf. Solid-State Sensors & Actuators (Transducers '93), 288 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Mastrangelo, C. H. and Hsu, C. H., Proc. IEEE Solid-State Sensor & Actuator Workshop (Hilton Head), 208 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Mastrangelo, C. H. and Hsu, C. H., J. MEMS 2 (1), 33 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Mastrangelo, C. H. and Hsu, C. H., J. MEMS 2 (1), 44 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Abe, T., Messner, W. C. and Reed, M. L., J. MEMS, (1995).Google Scholar
8. Legtenberg, R., Elders, J. and Elwenspoek, M., Proc. Int. Conf. Solid-State Sensors & Actuators (Transducers '93), 298 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Houston, M. R., Maboudian, R. and Howe, R. T., Proc. Int. Conf. Solid-State Sensors & Actuators (Transducers '95), 210 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Yee, Y., Chun, K. and Lee, J. D., Proc. Int. Conf. Solid-State Sensors & Actuators (Transducers '95), 206 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Mulhern, G. T., Soane, D. S. and Howe, R. T., Proc. Int. Conf. Solid-State Sensors & Actuators (Transducers '93), 296 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Houston, M. R., Howe, R. T., Komvopoulos, K. and Maboudian, R., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 383, 391 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Houston, M. R., Maboudian, R. and Howe, R. T., Proc. IEEE Solid-State Sensor & Actuator Workshop (Hilton Head), 42 (1996).Google Scholar
14. Man, P. F., Gogoi, B. P. and Mastrangelo, C. H., IEEE MEMS (San Diego), 55 (1996).Google Scholar
15. Ewalds, H. L. and Wanhill, R. J. H., Fracture Mechanics, 82–84 (Edward Arnold and Delftse Uitgevers Maatschapij, London, 1991).Google Scholar
16. Johnson, K. L., Kendall, K. and Roberts, A. D., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A. 324, 301 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Derjaguin, B. V., Muller, V. M. and Toporov, Y. P., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 53(2), 314 (1975).Google Scholar
18. Israelachvili, J. N., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 44, 259 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Horn, R. G., Israelachvili, J. N. and Pribac, F., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 115 (2), 480 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. de Boer, M. P. and Michalske, T. A., J. Appl. Phys., (to be submitted).Google Scholar
21. Michalske, T. A. and Fuller, E. R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68, 586 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Houston, M. R., Howe, R. T. and Maboudian, R., J. Appl. Phys., (submitted).Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Improved Autoadhesion Measurement Method for Micromachined Polysilicon Beams
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Improved Autoadhesion Measurement Method for Micromachined Polysilicon Beams
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Improved Autoadhesion Measurement Method for Micromachined Polysilicon Beams
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *