Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-5pczc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:07:00.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gleaning Processual Data from Materials Analysis of Museum Collections: The Harvard University Peabody Museulm's Mecklenburg Collection and Social Evolution in Late Rehistoric Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Michael N. Geseilwitz
Michael N. Geseilwitz*
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Peabody Museum Cambridge, MA 02138
Get access

Extract

In recent years the research potential of museum collections has come to be more widely recognized by anthropologists [1]. There are a number of factors that account for a turn from collecting “primary” data towards an approach based on reevaluating material remains collected by another. Prehistoric archaeologists have often led the way in artifactual analysis because the physical artifact is our only means of reconstructing past lifeways. Although sane have argued that this limitation in our range of data does not limit the possibilities of ultimate reconstruction [2], nevertheless it is with the artifact that we must begin.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 123: Symposium L – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology I , 1988 , 205
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rothschild, N.A. and Cantwell, A.-M. E., in The Research Potential of Anthropological Museum Collections, edited by Cantwell, A.-M. E., Griffin, J. B., and Rothschild, N.A. (New York Academy of Sciences, Annals vol.376, New York, 1981), pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
2. Binford, L.R., American Antiquity 28, 217–225 (1962).Google Scholar
3. Smith, C.S., A Search for Structure, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981), p. 69.Google Scholar
4. For a recent example with a good bibliography of earlier works, see England, P.A. and Zelst, L. van, editors, Application of Science in Examination of Works of Art (Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 1985).Google Scholar
5. Lemonnier, P., Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5, 147–186.Google Scholar
6. For this and other basic archaeological concepts, see Sharer, R.J. and Ashmore, W., Fundamentals of Archaeology, (Benjamin/Cunmings, Menlo Park, CA, 1979), p. 523–527 Google Scholar
7. Trigger, B., Ann. Rev. Anthropology 13, 276.Google Scholar
8. Lechtman, H. and Steinberg, A., in The History and Philosophy of Technology, edited by Bugliarello, G. and Doner, D.B. (University of Illinois, Urbana, 1979), pp. 135–160.Google Scholar
9. Sharer and Ashmore, p. 523Google Scholar
10. Sharer and Ashmore, p. 513.Google Scholar
11. Wells, P.S., Farms, Villages, and Cities, (Cornell University, Ithica, 1984), pp. 54–78 Google Scholar
12. Wells, pp. 38–54Google Scholar
13. Pleiner, R., in The Coming of the Age of Iron, edited by Wertime, T.A. and Muhly, J.D. (Yale University, New haven, 1980), pp. 375–415 Google Scholar
14. Wells, pp. 97–101.Google Scholar
15. Wells, p. 79.Google Scholar
16. Bintliff, J., in European Social Evolution (Chanctonbury Press, West Chiltington, Sussex, 1984), pp. 195–200.Google Scholar
17. Wells, pp. 143–149.Google Scholar
18. Wells, pp. 158–170.Google Scholar
19. Geselowitz, M.N., Research in Economic Anthropology 10 (in press); in Tribe and Polity in Late Prehistoric Europe, edited by Gibson, D.B. and Geselowitz, M.N. (Plenum Press, New York, in press), pp.137–155.Google Scholar
20. Geselowitz, M.N., Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University, 1987.Google Scholar
21. This use of categories that would have had physical meaning to prehistorartisans is common in archaeometallurgical studies. See, for instance, SPiaskowski, J., Irish Archaeological Forum 4, pp. 13–22 (1977).Google Scholar
22. For a discussion of the statistical techniques used in this paper, see Anderson, T.R. and Zelditch, M. Jr.,, A Basic Course in Statistics, (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1968), pp. 264–269.Google Scholar
23. Pleiner, R., VerÖffenlichungen des Museums fur Ur- und Frdhgeschichte Potsdam 20, 237–240 (1986).Google Scholar
24. Pleiner, , (1980) p. 104, table 11.4. Editor's Note: The title of Dr. Geselowitz's thesis is Technological Development and Social Change: ITonworking in Late Prehistoric Central Europe.Google Scholar