Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T20:14:28.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Geochemical Behaviour of Nickel in the Repository Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

David Savage
David Savage*
Affiliation:
Intera Information Technologies Ltd., 47 Burton Street, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire LE13 1AF, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

59Ni may make significant contributions to calculated doses in performance assessment (PA) studies of geological repositories for radioactive waste, due principally to the adoption of relatively high near-field solubilities. Ni concentration values used in PA are typically 1–6 orders of magnitude greater than those measured in natural groundwaters. This difference is a result of the utilisation in PA of solubility data for pure nickeliferous solids, and in some instances, the selection of solids chemically incompatible with the disposal environment. The geochemical behaviour of Ni is reviewed. It is considered highly unlikely that Ni will form discrete pure solids in the repository near-field, so that partition as a trace element into solid solutions should be considered. Henry’s law behaviour of trace elements is discussed and geochemically-realistic Ni solubility values for HLW and L/ILW disposal scenarios calculated. It is concluded that Ni will behave according to the chemical conditions of the disposal environment, which should be reflected in the choice of solubility data for PA. The adoption of solid solution modelling for other elements of interest to PA should be considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 353: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII , 1994 , 1159
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. McKinley, I.G. and Savage, D., Radiochim. Acta (1994, in press).Google Scholar
2. Pilkington, N.J. and Stone, N.S., Report UK Nirex Ltd No. NSS/R186, 1990.Google Scholar
3. Edmunds, W.M., Cook, J.M., Kinniburgh, D.G., Miles, D.L. and Trafford, J.M., Report Brit. Geol. Surv. SD/89/3, 1989.Google Scholar
4. Gassama, N., Michard, G., Beaucaire, C., Sarazin, G., Chem. Geol. 107, 417 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Hamilton, S.M., Michel, F.A. and Jefferson, C.W., Geol. Surv. Canada, Pap. 88–1E, 1988.Google Scholar
6. Jickells, T.D., Simmons, J.A.K., Kemp, K., Lyons, W.B. and Knap, A.H., Stygologia 2,181 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Webster, J.G., Chem. Geol. 112, 255 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Bruno, J., Cross, J.E., Eikenberg, J., McKinley, I.G., Read, D., Sandino, A., and Sellin, P., J. Geochem. Explor. 45, 451 (1991).Google Scholar
9. McKinley, I.G., Bath, A.H., Berner, U., Cave, M. and Neal, C., Radiochim. Acta 44/45,311 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Nagra, Report NTB 91–10, 1992.Google Scholar
11. Lippard, S.J., Shelton, A.W. and Gass, I.G., The Ophiolite of Northern Oman, Geol. Soc. London Memoir No. 11 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1986), 178 pp.Google Scholar
12. Krauskopf, K.B., Introduction to Geochemistry, (McGraw-Hill, 1967).Google Scholar
13. Wedepohl, K.H., Handbook of Geochemistry U-3, (Springer-Verlag, 1978).Google Scholar
14. Decarreau, A., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 49, 1537 (1985); B. Velde, ibid., 52, 415 (1988).Google Scholar
15. Brookins, D.G., Eh-pH Diagrams for Geochemistry, (Springer-Verlag, 1988).Google Scholar
16. Golightly, J.P., Econ. Geol. 75th Anniv. Vol., 710 (1981).Google Scholar
17. Lin, S. and Popp, R.K., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48, 2713 (1984); W.E. Seyfried and W.E. Dibble, ibid., 44, 309 (1980); W.E. Seyfried and J.L. Bischoff, ibid., 45, 135 (1981); S.E. Humphris and G. Thompson, ibid., 42, 127 (1978).Google Scholar
18. Barrett, T.J., Taylor, P.N. and Lugowski, J., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 51, 2241 (1987); L. Charlet and A. Manceau, ibid., 58, 2577 (1994).Google Scholar
19. Walker, T.R., Geol. Assoc. Canada Spec. Paper 36, pp 85–96 (1989).Google Scholar
20. Mclntire, W.L., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 27,1209 (1963); D.A. Sverjensky, ibid., 40, 1051 (1985).Google Scholar
21. Bourcier, W.L., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, edited by Abrajano, T. and Johnson, L.H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. Vol. 212, Pittsburg, PA, 1991) pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
22. Wolery, T.J., Report Lawr. Livermore Nat. Lab. UCRL-MA-110662 PT I, 1992.Google Scholar
23. Reardon, E.J., Waste Mgt. 12, 221,1992.Google Scholar
24. Neal, C. and Stanger, G., in The Chemistry of Weathering, edited by Drever, J.I., (D. Reidel, Rotterdam, 1985), pp 249–275.Google Scholar