Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T08:05:30.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrodeposition of Nanomodulated Ceramic Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Jay A. Switzer
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA 15261.
Michael J. Shane
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA 15261.
Richard J. Phillips
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA 15261.
Get access

Abstract

Electrochemistry can be used for the atomic-level architecture of ceramic materials. In this report, ceramic superlattices based on the TlaPbbOc/TldPbeOf system were electrodeposited with individual layer thicknesses as thin as 3nm. The superlattices were deposited from a single aqueous solution at room temperature, and the layer thicknesses were galvanostatically controlled. Substitution of Tl2O3 into PbO2 appears to stabilize a face-centered cubic structure with an average lattice parameter of 0.536nm. The lattice parameters for the T1aPbbOc. mixed oxides vary by less than 0.3% when the Pb/Tl ratio is varied from 0.84 to 7.3. Because the modulation wavelengths are of electron mean free path dimensions, this new class of degenerate semiconductor metal-oxide superlattices may show thickness-dependent quantum optical, electronic, or optoelectronic effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Switzer, J. A., Shane, M. J., and Phillips, R. J., Science, 247, 444 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Cohen, U., Koch, F. B. and Sard, R., J. Electrochem Soc., 130, 1987 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Tench, D. and White, J., Metall. Trans. A, 15, 2039 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Yahalom, J. et al. , J. Mater. Res., 4, 755 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Lashmore, D. S. and Daniel, M. P., J. Electrochem. Soc., 135, 1218 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Bennett, L H. et al. , J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 67, 239 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Phillips, R.J, Shane, M. J., and Switzer, J. A., J. Mater. Res., 4, 923 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Switzer, J. A., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 66, 1521 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Switzer, J. A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 133, 722 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Mindt, W., J. Electrochem. Soc., 116, 1076 (1969).Google Scholar
11. Thomas, J. C. G. and Wabner, D. W., J. Electroanal. Chem., 135, 243 (1982).Google Scholar
12. Sakai, M., Sekine, T., and Yamazaki, Y., J. Electrochem Soc., 130, 1631 (1983).Google Scholar
13. Tillmetz, W. and Wabner, D. W., Naturforsch, Z.. Teil B 39, 594 (1984).Google Scholar
14. Shukla, V. N. and Wirtz, G. P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 60, 253 (1977).Google Scholar
15. Leavens, C. R. and Taylor, R., Eds., “Interfaces, Quantum Wells, and Superlattices,” (NATO Series B: Physics, vol. 179) (Plenum, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
16. Mandez, E. E. and Von Klitzing, K., Eds., “Physics and Applications of Quantum Wells and Superlattices,” (NATO Series B: Physics, vol. 170) (Plenum, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
17. Moseley, P. T., Hutchison, J. L., and Bourke, M. A. M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 129, 876 (1982).Google Scholar