Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:16:20.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Volume Fraction and Composition on the Rheological Properties of Polyacrylic Acid/Polyacrylamide Hydrogels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Bryan Baker
Affiliation:
bryan.baker@mse.gatech.edu, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, 771 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States
Rebecca Murff
Affiliation:
gtg333y@mail.gatech.edu, Georgia Institute of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States
Valeria T. Milam
Affiliation:
valeria.milam@mse.gatech.edu, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, 771 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States
Get access

Abstract

Polyacrylamide-based hydrogels are popular materials that have been extensively studied for their applications in the field of biomaterials due to their permeability and biological compatibility. A major limitation of this polymeric material, however, in biological applications stems from their limited mechanical stiffness. The current study examines the mechanical properties of polyacrylamide-polyacrylic acid-based hydrogels at varying volume fractions and compositions using oscillatory rheology. For a fixed chemical cross-linker concentration, an increase in the volume fraction of hydrogel resulted in an increase in the shear elastic modulus of the hydrogel. Additionally, varying the relative ratio of polyacrylamide to polyacrylic acid resulted in modest changes in the shear elastic modulus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Peppas, N.A., Hydrogels, in Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine, B.D., Ratner, A.S., Hoffman, F.J., Schoen and J.E., Lemons, Editors. 1996, Academic Press, New York: p. 6064.Google Scholar
2. Wang, H.-B., Dembo, M., and Wang, Y.-L., Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2000. 279: p. C1345–C1350.Google Scholar
3. Pelham, R.J. and Wang, Y.-L., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997. 94: p. 1366113665.Google Scholar
4. Wang, Y.-L. and Pelham, R.J., Preparation of a Flexible, Porous Polyacrylamide Substrate for Mechanical Studies of Cultured Cells, in Molecular Motors and the Cytoskeleton Part B, R.B., Vallee, Editor. 1998, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
5. Hayashi, T., Biomedical Applications of Polymeric Materials. 1993, CRC Press, Boca Raton: p. 1751.Google Scholar
6. Smith, C., Young, I., and Kearney, J., Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 1996. 118(1): p. 5661.Google Scholar
7. Breedveld, V., et al., Macromolecules, 2004. 37: p. 39433953.Google Scholar
8. Calvet, D., Wong, J.Y., and Giasson, S., Macromolecules, 2004. 37: p. 77627771.Google Scholar
9. Benda, D., Snuparek, J., and Cermak, V., European Polymer Journal, 2001. 37: p. 12471253.Google Scholar
10. Katime, I., et al., Polymer Testing, 1999. 18: p. 559566.Google Scholar