Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T01:51:57.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Confinement on Plastic Deformation in Passivated AL Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S.G.H. Anderson
Affiliation:
Materials Laboratory for Interconnect and Packaging, University of Texas at Austin, BRC/MER Mail Code 78650, Austin, TX 78758-1100
I.-S. Yeo
Affiliation:
Materials Laboratory for Interconnect and Packaging, University of Texas at Austin, BRC/MER Mail Code 78650, Austin, TX 78758-1100
P.S. Ho
Affiliation:
Materials Laboratory for Interconnect and Packaging, University of Texas at Austin, BRC/MER Mail Code 78650, Austin, TX 78758-1100
S. Ramaswami
Affiliation:
Advanced Micro Devices, 901 Thompson Place, P.O. Box 3453, Sunnyvale, CA 94088-3000
R. Cheung
Affiliation:
Advanced Micro Devices, 901 Thompson Place, P.O. Box 3453, Sunnyvale, CA 94088-3000
Get access

Abstract

Wafer curvature measurements of a trilayer (SiO2 / AlSiCu / Si) structure are compared to that predicted by a weighted sum of individual measurements of SiO2 and AlSiCu films on Si, and significant differences are found to exist for temperatures above 200°C. A straightforward analysis of the stresses in each layer has been modeled using an extension of a model by Feng et al. which assumes uniform plastic deformation throughout the Al. The modeling results suggest a straightforeward method for determining stresses in deformable thin films that are confined by elastic overlayers. A comparison of the stress-temperature behavior for unpassivated and passivated AlSiCu films reveals that the confined films exhibit less plastic deformation and both higher tension and compression during thermal cycling.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Stoney, G.G., Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 82, 172 (1909).Google Scholar
2 Hoffman, R.W., in Physics of Thin Films, Hass, G. and Thun, R.E., Eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1966), Vol. 3, p. 211.Google Scholar
3 Liu, H.C. and Murarka, S.P., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 3458 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Feng, Z-C. and Liu, H-D., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 83 (1983), and references contained therein.Google Scholar
5 Townsend, P.H., Barnett, D.M. and Branner, T.A., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 4438 (1987).Google Scholar
6 Flinn, P.A., Gardner, D.J. and Nix, W.D., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED–34, 689 (1987).Google Scholar
7 Hu, S.M., J. Appl. Phys. 70, R53 (1991), and references contained therein.Google Scholar
8 Tezaki, A., Mineta, T., Egawa, H., and Noguchi, T., IEEE Int. Reliability Phys. Symp. 1990, p. 221.Google Scholar
9 Flinn, P.A. and Chiang, C., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 2927 (1990).Google Scholar
10 Moske, M.A., Ho, P.S., Mikalsen, D.J., Cuomo, J.J. and Rosenberg, R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 203, 77 (1991).Google Scholar
11 Korhonen, M., Paszkiet, C., Black, R.D., and Li, C.-Y., Scripta Met. 24, 2297 (1990).Google Scholar
12 Doerner, M.F., Gardner, D.S. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 845 (1986).Google Scholar
13 Ventkatramen, R., Bravman, J.C., Nix, W.D., Davies, P.W., Flinn, P.A. and Fraser, D.B., J. Electron. Mater. 19, 1231 (1990).Google Scholar
14 Venkatraman, R. and Bravman, J.C., J. Mater. Res. 7, 2040 (1992).Google Scholar
15 Chen, S.T., Yang, C.H., Faupel, F. and Ho, P.S., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 6690 (1988).Google Scholar
16 Flinn, P.A., in Stress-Induced Phenomena in Metallization, Li, C.-Y., Totta, P., and Ho, P.S., Eds. (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1992), p. 73.Google Scholar
17 Draper, B.L. and Hill, T.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B9, 1956 (1991).Google Scholar
18 Moske, M.A., Lewis, J.E., and Ho, P.S., ANTEC '91, p. 1731.Google Scholar