Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T16:21:03.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effective Modulus and Stress Relaxation of Freestanding Aluminum Microtensile Beams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

P. A. El-Deiry
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
N. Barbosa III
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
W. L. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
R. P. Vinci
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Get access

Abstract

Freestanding Al thin film microtensile beams 600 μm long, 100 μm wide, and with thicknesses of 0.25 μm, 0.50 μm, 0.75 μm, and 1.00 μm were tested under uniaxial tension with a custom-built microtensile system. Displacement controlled experiments employing five strain rates between 8.3 × 10−4 s−1 and 8.3 × 10−1 s−1 were performed. Three crosshead displacements of 1.00 μm (0.17% strain), 2.60 μm (0.43%), and 3.60 μm (0.60% strain) were exercised in order to investigate behavior in the elastic, anelastic, and the inelastic sections of the stress/strain curve.

At a 0.17% strain amplitude, the 0.50 μm thick microtensile beams exhibit an effective modulus that increases with increasing strain rate. The 1.00 μm, 0.75 μm, and 0.25 μm microtensile beams do not show a similar trend. The 0.25 μm and the 0.75 μm thick microtensile beams have similar grain sizes and similar moduli; the 0.50 μm and the 1.00 μm microtensile beams have similar but smaller grain sizes and higher effective moduli. This suggests that grain size is more significant than film thickness in determining the effective modulus of freestanding Al thin films. Furthermore, no stress relaxation behavior was identified for any of the films during the hold at the 0.17% strain amplitude.

At a strain amplitude of 0.43%, the effective moduli are very similar to the values measured at a 0.17% strain amplitude; however, the 0.50 μm and 1.00 μm thick microtensile beams show measurable stress relaxation while the 0.25 μm and 0.75 μm microtensile beams do not. This result combined with a lower observed modulus suggests that the particular anelastic mechanisms operating in these films at these time scales activate sooner and provide a faster stress relaxation process in the larger grained films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nathanson, H. C., Newell, W. E., Wickstrom, R. A., Davis, J. R. Jr., IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices 14, 117133 (1967).Google Scholar
2. Davis, J.R., ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary (ASM International, 1992).Google Scholar
3. Spolenak, R., Volkert, C. A., Ziegler, S., Panofen, C., and Brown, W. L., “Reverse” Stress Relaxation in Cu Thin Films, 673, 1.4.1–1.4.6, 2001, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings.Google Scholar
4. Thouless, M. D., Gupta, J., Harper, J. M. E., Journal of Materials Research, 8, 18451852 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Barbosa, Nicholas III, Ph.D. Dissertation, Lehigh University (2005).Google Scholar
6. Barbosa, Nicholas III, El-Deiry, Paul, Vinci, Richard P., “Monotonic Testing and Tension-Tension Fatigue Testing of Freestanding Al Microtensile Beams,” 795, U11.39.1U11.39.6, 2004, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings.Google Scholar
7. El-Deiry, Paul A, Ph.D. Dissertation, Lehigh University (2005).Google Scholar
8. Huang, H. and Spaepen, F., Acta Mater. 48, 32613269 (2000).Google Scholar