Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:41:05.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Nitrogen Content on Interfacial Adhesion of the Ta/SiO2 Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Michael Lane ,
Reiner Dauskardt ,
Nety Krishna  and
Imran Hashim
Michael Lane
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University
Reiner Dauskardt
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University
Nety Krishna
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, Santa Clara, CA
Imran Hashim
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, Santa Clara, CA
Get access

Abstract

With the advent of copper metallization in interconnect structures, new barrier layers are required to prevent copper diffusion into the adjacent dielectrics as well as the underlying silicon. These barriers must not only prevent interdiffusion but also provide adequate adhesion to both the dielectric and copper. Ta and TaN have received considerable attention as barrier layers in copper metallization schemes. While much has been reported on their diffusion properties, little or no quantitative data exists on their adhesive properties. We present data on both the interface fracture energy and the subcritical debonding of ionmetal- plasma sputtered Ta and TaN films on thermal silicon oxide. Data is also presented showing the significant effect of interfacial chemistry, particularly varying nitrogen contents at the TaN/SiO2 interface.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 564: Symposium N – Advanced Interconnects and Contacts , 1999 , 281
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kolawa, E., Chen, J. S., Reid, J. S., Pokela, P. J. and Nicolet, M.-A., “Tantalum-based Diffusion Barriers in Si/Cu VLSI Metallizations,” J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 70 [3], 1369–73.10.1063/1.349594Google Scholar
2. Holloway, K. and Fryer, P., “Tantalum as a Diffusion Barrier Between Copper and Silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 1990, 57 [17], 1736–38.Google Scholar
3. Hutchinson, J. W. and Suo, Z., “Mixed Mode Cracking in Layered Materials.” Advances in Applied Mechanics, ed. Hutchinson, J. W. and Yu, T. Y., (New York, Academic Press, 1991), 63–191.Google Scholar
4. Evans, A. G. and Hutchinson, J. W., “Effects of Non-Planarity on the Mixed Mode Fracture Resistance of B imaterial Interfaces,” Acta. Metall., 1989, 37 [3], 909–16.Google Scholar
5. Evans, A. G., Ruhle, M., Dalgleish, B. J. and Charlambides, P. G., “The Fracture Energy of Bimaterial Interfaces,”, Metall. Trans. A, 1990, 21A, 2419–2429.Google Scholar
6. Bhatnagar, A., Hoffman, M. J., Dauskardt, R. H., “The Effect of Environment on Subcritical Crack-Growth Behavior in Y-Si-Al-O-N Glasses,” Amer. Cerm. Soc., 1999. In review.Google Scholar
7. Dauskardt, R. H., Lane, M., Ma, Q. and Krishna, N., “Adhesion and Debonding of Multi-Layer Thin Film Structures,” Eng. Fract. Mech. 1998, 61, 141–62.10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-6Google Scholar
8. Lane, M., Dauskardt, R. H., Ware, R., Ma, Q. and Fujimoto, H., “Progressive Debonding of Mulit-Layer Interconnect Structures,” Proceedings of the 1997 MRS Spring Symposium, San Francisco, CA. Materials Reliability in Microelectronics VII, v 473, 21–6.Google Scholar
9. Ma, Q., “A Four-Point Bending Technique for Studying Subcritical Crack Growth in Thin Films and at Interfaces,” J. Mat. Res., 1997, 12, 840–45.Google Scholar
10. Michalske, T. and Bunker, B., “Steric Effects in Stress Corrosion Fracture of Glass,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1987, 70 [10], 780–84.Google Scholar
11. Lane, M. and Dauskardt, R. H., analysis to be submitted for publication.Google Scholar
12. Mencik, J., “Strength and Fracture of Glass and Ceramics,” Elsevier Science Publishers, (1992).Google Scholar
13. Cook, R. and Liniger, E., “Kinetics of Indentation Cracking in Glass,” J. AM Ceram. Soc. 76 [5] 1096–105 (1993).Google Scholar
14. Lane, M., Krishna, N. and Dauskardt, R. H., unpublished data.Google Scholar