Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T08:22:14.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Molybdenum on the Electronic Structure of Iron Grain Boundaries with Phosphorus and Boron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Genrich L. Krasko*
Affiliation:
Army Research Laboratory, Materials Directorate, Watertown, MA 02172-0001
Get access

Abstract

We are reporting preliminary results on LMTO supercell calculations on a Σ3 (111) grain boundary (GB) in Fe with Mo atoms sitting at the GB plane. Calculations were performed both for the clean (CL) GB and GB with P/B atoms occupying centers of host (Fe and Mo) atom trigonal prisms (a coordination typical of the Fe GBs). The geometry of the GBs was not changed upon substituting Mo for Fe in the GB plane: all the interplanar distances and atomic radii were preserved (these were calculated earlier for the Fe GBs from GB3 relaxation modelling using the Embedded Atom Method). Comparison of the electron charge-density distributions within the atomic spheres for GBs with and without Mo, has shown that the presence of Mo at the GB plane increases both the number of d-electrons and the total charge density within atomic spheres of the atoms most important for intergranular cohesion. This should result in enhanced cohesion. The magnetic moments of the constituent atoms were also found to be strongly affected by the addition of Mo. The Mo atoms are anti-ferromagnetically coupled with the neighboring Fe atoms: mM0=-O.6OμB (CL GB), mMo=-O.14μB (GB with P), and mMo=-O.18μB (GB with B).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Embrittlement of Engineering Alloys, edited by Briant, C. L. and Banerji, S.K., Acad. Press, New York, 1983; G. B. Olson, in Innovations in Ultrahigh -Strength Steel TechnoLOgy, edited by G. B. Olson, M. Azrin and E. S. Wright, Sagamore Army Research Conference Proceedings (1987), p. 3.Google Scholar
2. Meyers, C. L. Jr., Onoda, G. Y., Levy, A. V., and Kotfila, R. J., Trans. Metall. Society of AIME, 233, 720 (1965).Google Scholar
3. Joshi, J. and Stein, D. F., Metall. Trans, 1, 2544 (1970).Google Scholar
4. Smith, D. A. and S'mith, G. D. W., in The Microstructure and Design of Alloys, Proc. of the 3rd Intl. Conf. on the Strength of Metals and Alloys, London, 1973, pp. 144148.Google Scholar
5. Siah, M. P. and Hondros, E. D., in Atomistics of Fracture, edited by Latanision, R. M. and Pickens, J. R., Plenum, New York, 1983, pp. 855888.Google Scholar
6. Lee, D. Y., Barrera, E. V., Stark, J. P. and Marcus, H. L., Metall. Trans., 15A,1415 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Krasko, G. L., Scripta Metall. et Mater. 28, 1543 (1993).Google Scholar
8 Krasko, G. L. and Olson, G. B., Solid State Commun., 76, 247 (1990), and references therein, 113(1991).Google Scholar
9. Krasko, G. L. and Olson, G. B., Solid State Commun., 79, 113 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Wu, R. and Freeman, A. J., Phys. Rev. B, 47, 3904 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Wu, R., Freeman, A. J., and Olson, G. B., Phys. Rev. B, 47, 6855 (1993)Google Scholar
12. Wu, R., Li, C., Freeman, A. J., and Olson, G. B., J. Mater. Res., 7, 2403 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Krasko, G. L., in Structure and Properties of Interfaces in Materials, edited by Clark, W. A. T., Dahmen, U. and Briant, C. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 238, Pittsburgh, PA, p.481 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Gelatt, C. D. Jr., Williams, A. R., and Moruzzi, V. L., Phys. Rev. B, 27, 2005 (1983).Google Scholar
15. Kimura, H., Trans. Japan. Inst. Met., 29, 521 (1988); H. Kimura, K. Abiko, and S. Suzuki, in Interfacial Structure. Properties and Design of Steel, edited by M. H. Yoo, C. L. Briant, and W. A. T. Clark, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 122, Pittsburgh, PA, p.379 (1988); M. Guttmann, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc London, A295, 169 (1980). 374Google Scholar