Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T10:13:43.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Controlling Fracture Behavior of Polymeric Hydrogels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Hyun Joon Kong
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Get access

Abstract

Refined control over the mechanical properties of hydrogels formed from cross-linking of polymers is increasingly regarded as critical for their successful application. In general, increasing the cross-linking density (ρ) of polymer gels raises the mechanical rigidity, but makes the gels more brittle. We proposed that controlling properties of the cross-linking junction and the cross-linking type would mediate the fracture response of the gels, and allow one to decouple the dependency of the mechanical stiffness and toughness from ρ of the gel. This possibility was investigated with alginate hydrogels, because alginate can be gelled via ionic or covalent cross-linking. Increasing ρ of the gels formed using covalent cross-linking with adipic acid dihydrazide or poly (acrylamide-co-hydrazide) raised the elastic modulus (E), but led to a reduction in the toughness of the gels. In contrast, increasing the number of calcium cross-links slowed the crack opening of the gels, and subsequently raised both E and work to fracture (W). From the results of this study, we could demonstrate a novel approach to regulate different mechanical properties of gels in an independent manner. This study provides a valuable guideline to the design of a broad array of polymer hydrogels.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ratner, B. D. and Hoffman, A. S., in Hydrogels for Medical and Related Applications; Andrade, J. D. Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1976; Vol. 31, p.1.Google Scholar
2. Lee, K. Y. and Mooney, D. J.. Chem. Rev. 101, 1869 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Clayton, A. B., Chirila, T. V., and Lou, X.. Polym. Int. 44, 201 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Smith, B. L., Schaffer, E. T., Viani, M., Thompson, J. B., Frederick, N. A., Kindt, J., Belcher, A., Stucky, G. D., Morse, D. E., and Hansma, P. K.. Nature 399, 761 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Draget, K. I., Skják-Bræk, G., Smidsrød, O.. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 21, 47 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Lee, K. Y., Bouhadir, K., and Mooney, D. J.. Biomaterials 25, 2461 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Kong, H. J., Wong, E., and Mooney, D. J.. Macromolecules 36, 4582 (2003).Google Scholar