Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T15:02:05.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Nanophase Materials by X-Ray Diffraction and Computer Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. A. Eastman
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439-4838
L. J. Thompson
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439-4838
Get access

Abstract

X-ray diffraction experiments on nanophase Pd have been performed with the primary goal of determining the nature of grain boundary structures in nanophase materials. A kinematical diffraction analysis has been developed to interpret x-ray θ-2θ data by comparing actual scans with scans produced by computer simulation. This simulation program has been used to explore the effects on diffracted intensity of a variety of microstructural and grain boundary structural parameters such as void concentration, grain size, grain boundary width, and changes in interplanar spacing and density in grain boundary regions. It has been found that a reasonable match to experimental data is produced by at least two model structures; in one, the material contains randomly positioned voids or vacancies, while in the other, the interplanar spacings in grain boundary regions are varied with respect to the spacings found in the grain interiors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Birringer, R., Herr, U. and Gleiter, H., Suppl. Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 27, 43 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Siegel, R. W. and Eastman, J. A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 132, 3 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Andres, R. P. et al., J. Mater. Res. 4, 704 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Zhu, X., Birringer, R., Herr, U. and Gleiter, H., Phys. Rev. B 35, 9085 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Thomas, G. J., Siegel, R. W. and Eastman, J. A., these Proceedings.Google Scholar
6. Vaudin, M. D., Burkel, E. and Sass, S. L., Phil. Mag. A 54, 1 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Montano, P. A., Shenoy, G. K., Alp, E. E., Schulze, W. and Urban, J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 56 (19), 2076 (1986).Google Scholar