Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T21:20:20.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Catalyzed Gaseous Etching of Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

N. Selamoglu
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
J. A. Mucha
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
D. L. Flamm
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
D. E. Ibbotson
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

Etching of silicon by molecular fluorine is accelerated when trace quantities of copper are present on the surface. Copper is a residue formed when sputter-deposited aluminum (containing 0.5 % copper) is selectively removed by HF from the silicon surface. The temperature dependence of the etching rate was studied in the range 60–290°C. At temperatures higher than 80°C copper causes a ˜100-fold increase in the rate of etching of the underlying silicon (100), compared to unmetallized samples. Above 180°C, F2 exhibits a higher absolute etch rate than equivalent concentrations of fluorine atoms. Preliminary results for other metal contaminants and etchant gases indicate that silver also accelerates F2 etching, and copper enhances etching by NF3. The results are interpreted in terms of a catalytic mechanism.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Williams, D. S., Coleman, E. and Brown, J. M., in “Proceedings of the MRS, Tungsten and Other Refractory Metals for VLSI Applications”, edited by Blewer, R. S. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1986) p. 125.Google Scholar
2. Wagner, R. S., J. Crystal Growth,3,4, 159 (1968).Google Scholar
3. Makino, T., Nakamura, H. and Asano, M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 128, 103 (1981).Google Scholar
4. White, L. K. and Maa, J.-S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 46, 1050 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Flamm, D. L., Cowan, P. L. and Golovchenko, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 17, 1341 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Flamm, D. L. and Mogab, C. J., in “4th IUPAC Symp. Plasma Chem.”, Zurich, Switzerland, Veprek, S and Hertz, J. (eds.), p.119 (August, 1979).Google Scholar
7. Flamm, D. L., Donnelly, V. M. and Mucha, J. A., J. Appl. Phys., 52, 3633 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ibbotson, D. E., Flamm, D. L., Mucha, J. A. and Donnelly, V. M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 44, 1129 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Ibbotson, D. E., Mucha, J. A. and Flamm, D. L., J. Appl. Phys., 56, 2939 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Hurd, D. T. and Rochow, E. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 67, 1057 (1945).Google Scholar