Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:30:23.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atomistic Calculations on the Surfactant Role of Indium in the Homoepitaxial Growth of Cu on Cu (100)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. Breeman ,
G.T. Barkema  and
D.O. Boerma
M. Breeman
Affiliation:
Nuclear Solid State Physics, Materials Science Centre, Groningen University, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
G.T. Barkema
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853–2501, USA
D.O. Boerma
Affiliation:
Nuclear Solid State Physics, Materials Science Centre, Groningen University, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

We present atomistic calculations for the system In on Cu (100), using the atom-embedding model of Finnis and Sinclair. It was found that the energy banier for Cu adatoms to jump off a descending step is higher than the adatom migration energy, i.e. descending steps form an additional barrier for diffusion. The presence of In atoms at or in step edges or island edges drastically reduces the energy barrier for interlayer diffusion of Cu adatoms. Therefore, we predict that In atoms may be used as surfactants to improve the homoepitaxial growth of Cu on Cu (100), especially in the temperature range between 150 and 200 K.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 317: Symposium B – Mechanisms of Thin Film Evolution , 1993 , 329
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Venables, J.A., Spiller, G.D.T., and Hanbrücken, M., Rep. Prog. Phys. 47, 399 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Shinjo, T., Surf. Sci. Rep. 12, 49 (1991).Google Scholar
[3] Johnson, M.T., Purcell, S.T., McGee, N.W.E., Coehoorn, R., aan de Stegge, J., and Hoving, W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2688 (1992).Google Scholar
[4] den Broeder, F.J.A., Kuiper, D., van de Mosselaer, A.P., and Hoving, W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2769 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Johnson, M.T., Coehoorn, R., de Vries, J.J., McGee, N.W.E., aan de Stegge, J., and Bloemen, P.J.H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 969 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] den Broeder, F.J.A., Hoving, W., and Bloemen, P.J.H., J. Magn. Mat. 93, 562 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Evans, J.W., Phys. Rev. B 39, 5655 (1989).Google Scholar
[8] Purcell, S.T., Arrot, A.S., and Heinrich, B., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 6, 794 (1988).Google Scholar
[9] van der Vegt, H.A., van Pinxteren, H.M., Lohmeier, M., Vlieg, E., and Thornton, J.M.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3335 (1992).Google Scholar
[10] Tromp, R.M., presented at the Int. Conf. Surf. Sci., The Hague, 1992.Google Scholar
[11] Vrijmoeth, J., Meyer, J.A., van der Vegt, H.A., Vlieg, E., and Behm, R.J., presented at the IVth Europ. Conf. on Surf. Cryst., Aarhus, 1993.Google Scholar
[12] Oppo, S., Fiorentini, V., and Scheffler, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2437 (1992).Google Scholar
[13] Finnis, M.W. and Sinclair, J.E., Philos. Mag. A 50, 45 (1984).Google Scholar
[14] Ackland, G.J., Finnis, M.W., and Vitek, V., J. Phys. F 18, L153 (1988).Google Scholar
[15] Ackland, G.J., Tichy, G., Vitek, V., and Finnis, M.W., Philos. Mag. A 56, 735 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Breeman, M., PhD thesis, Groningen University, 1993.Google Scholar
[17] Breeman, M. and Boenna, D.O., Surf. Sci. 287/288, 881 (1993).Google Scholar
[18] Breeman, M. and Boemia, D.O., Phys. Rev. B 46, 1703 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Breeman, M., Barkema, G.T., and Boenna, D.O., Surf. Sci., in press.Google Scholar
[20] Breeman, M. and Boenna, D.O., Surf. Sci. 269/270, 224 (1992).Google Scholar
[21] de Miguel, J.J., Sanchez, A., Cebollada, A., Gallego, J.M., Ferron, J., and Fener, S., Surf. Sci. 189/190, 1062 (1987).Google Scholar
[22] Egelhoff, W.F. Jr., and Jacob, I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 921 (1989).Google Scholar
[23] Ernst, H.J., Fabre, F., and Lapujoulade, J., Surf. Sci. Lett. 275, L682 (1992).Google Scholar
[24] Ernst, H.J., Fabre, F., and Lapujoulade, J., Phys. Rev. B 46, 1929 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar