Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:38:19.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atomic Force Microscopy Study of Nickel Oxide Films Modified by Reactive Element

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

F. Czerwinski  and
J.A. Szpunar
F. Czerwinski
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Que., H3A 2A7, Canada
Get access

Abstract

The evolution of microstructure of thin oxide films during growth has been quantitatively analysed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The oxide films were formed in pure oxygen atmosphere at temperatures ranging from 873 to 1173 K on polycrystalline nickel substrates. The substrates were both pure and superficially modified by nanometer-sized dispersions of CeO2. The incorporation of reactive element into the oxide inhibits the growth kinetics and affects the microscopic surface morphology. The extent of this effect depends essentially on the substrate surface microstructure prior to modification and the size of CeO2 particles. A correlation was found between the surface topography and the reduction of oxide growth rate caused by the reactive element.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 343: Symposium H – Polycrystalline Thin Films - Structure, Texture, Properties and Applications , 1994 , 529
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Chason, E., Falco, Ch.M., Ourmazd, A., Schubert, E.F., Slaughter, J.M. and Williams, R.S. in Evolution of Surface and Thin Film Microstructure. edited by Atwater, H.A., Chason, E., Grabow, M.H. and Legally, M.G. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proa, 280, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) p. 203.Google Scholar
2. Czerwinski, F. and Smeltzer, W.W., J. Electroch. Soc, 140, 2606 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Czerwinski, F., Szpunar, J.A., Macaulay-Newcombe, R.G. and Smeltzer, W.W., Oxid. Met., submitted.Google Scholar
4. Czerwinski, F., Sproule, G.I., Graham, M.J. and Smeltzer, W.W., to be published.Google Scholar
5. Rapp, R.A., Metall. Trans., 15A, 765 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Offenberg, M., Liehr, M. and Rubloff, G.W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A9, 1058 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Rojhantalab, H., Moinpour, M., Peter, N., Dass, M.L.A., Hough, W., Natter, R. and Moghadam, F. in Evolution of Surface and Thin Film Microstructure. edited by Atwater, H.A., Chason, E., Grabow, M.H. and Legally, M.G. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proa, 280, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) p. 147.Google Scholar
8. Bennett, J.M. and Mattsson, L., Introduction to Surface Analysis and Scattering. Optical Soc. of America, Washington, D.C. (1989).Google Scholar
9. Morin, F., Dufour, L.C. and Trudel, G., Oxid. Met., 37, 39 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar