Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T02:58:35.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analyses of Soils from the Commercial Radioactive Waste Disposal Sites at Barnwell, Sc, and Hanford, Wa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Paul L. Piciulo
Affiliation:
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
Colleen E. Shea
Affiliation:
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
Robert E. Barletta
Affiliation:
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
Get access

Abstract

Brookhaven National Laboratory, in order to provide technical assistance to the NRC, has measured a number of physical and chemical characteristics of soils from two commercial radioactive waste disposal sites: one at Barnwell, SC, and the other near Richland, WA. Materials commonly used for the containment and the solidification of radioactive waste are subject to underground corrosion. The data reported can be used to assess the corrosivity of each burial environment on a waste form or high integrity container. Samples of trench backfill soil, believed to be representative of the soil that will contact the buried waste forms were collected and analyzed. Earth resistivities were measured at each site. Laboratory measurement of the resistivities of water saturated backfill soils from both sites show values greater than 104 ohm-cm. This is indicative of soils having relatively small amounts of soluble ions and of soils likely to be very mildly corrosive to steel. The backfill soil from the Barnwell site is acidic having a pH ∼5. Measurements on Hanford backfill soil indicate a neutral environment; pH ∼7. The exchange acidity of the backfill soils from both sites was <2 meq per 100 g of soil and in most cases an alkaline reaction was observed. The pHs and exchange acidities of these soils are consistent with those of mildly corrosive soils. Aqueous extracts of saturated pastes were used to determine the concentrations of the following ions: Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na+, HCO3, SO4=, and Cl. The sulfide content of each of the soils was measured in a mixture of soil and an antioxidant buffer solution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Piciulo, P. L., Shea, C. E., and Barletta, R. E., “Analyses of Soils at Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Sites,” BNL-NUREG-31388, June 1982.Google Scholar
2. Romanoff, M., “Underground Corrosion,” NBS Circular 579, PB–168 350, April 1957.Google Scholar
3. Kalousek, G. L., Porter, L. C., and Harboe, E. M., “Past, Present, and Potential Developments of Sulfate-Resisting Concretes,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation 4, 347 (1976).Google Scholar
4. Black, C. A., Editor, Methods of Soil Analysis, Parts 1 and 2, Number 9 in the Agronomy, American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Wisconsin, 1965.Google Scholar
5. Denison, I. A. and Ewing, S. P., “Corrosiveness of Certain Ohio Soils,” Soil Science 40, 287299 (1935).Google Scholar
6. Palmer, J. D., “Soil Resistivity - Measurement and Analysis,” Materials Performance, p. 41–46, January 1974.Google Scholar
7. Gerhold, W. F., Escalante, E., and Sanderson, B. T., “The Corrosion Behavior of Selected Stainless Steels in Soil Environments,” NBSIR 81–2228 (NBS), PB81–178154.Google Scholar
8. Bosich, J. F., Corrosion Prevention for Practicing Engineers, Barnes and Noble, Inc., New York, 1970.Google Scholar
9. Weiss, A. J. and Colombo, P., Brookhaven National Laboratory, “Evaluation of Isotope Migration-Land Burial, Status Report Through September 30, 1979,” NUREG/CR-1289, BNL-NUREC-51143, March 1980.Google Scholar