Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-09T06:54:23.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Amorphisation of Perovskite: the Effect of Composition and Pre-Existing Cation Vacancies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Katherine L. Smith
Affiliation:
Materials Division, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, P.M.B. 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia, kls@ansto.gov.au
Gregory R. Lumpkin
Affiliation:
Materials Division, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, P.M.B. 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
Mark G. Blackford
Affiliation:
Materials Division, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, P.M.B. 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
Eric R. Vance
Affiliation:
Materials Division, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, P.M.B. 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Eight perovskites of different compositions and pre-existing vacancy contents were irradiated with 1.5 MeV Kr+ ions using the HVEM-Tandem User Facility at Argonne National Laboratory. The critical dose of 1.5 MeV Kr+ ions for amorphisation (Dc) of NaNbO3, SrTiO3 and two natural perovskites varies with composition and may decrease with Na content. The Dc values of 5 members of the solid solution series from SrTiO3 to La0.67TiO3 do not exhibit a simple relationship with vacancy content: In particular, Dc(Sr0.7La0.2TiO3) is extraordinarily high (>170 × 1014 ions cm−2) compared to those of the other (Sr, La)-perovskites in the series, which have Dc, values between 2.4 and 11×1014 ions cm−2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ewing, R.C., Weber, W.J. and Clinard, F.W. Jnr., Progress in Nuclear Energy, 29 [2] (1995) p. 63127.Google Scholar
2. Smith, K.L., Lumpkin, G.R. and Zaluzec, N.J., J. Nuc. Materials, 250 (1997) p. 3652.Google Scholar
3. Ringwood, A.E., Kesson, S.E., Reeve, K.D., Levins, D.M. and Ramm, E.J., in “Radioactive waste forms for the future”, eds Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C., Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (1998) p. 233334.Google Scholar
4. Blackford, M.G., Proc. 3rd Biennial Symp. on SEM Imaging and Analysis: Applications and Techniques, Feb. 15–17, 1995, U. Melbourne, Australia, (1997) pg. 98.Google Scholar
5. Ewing, R.C. and Wang, L.M., Nuc. Instr. Meths. Phys. Res. B65 (1992) p. 319323.Google Scholar
6. Weber, W. J., Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA, private communication.Google Scholar
7. Natl. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) Monograph. 25, 9 (1971) 17.Google Scholar
8. Tien, T.Y. and Hummel, F.A., Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soc., 66 (1967) p. 233245.Google Scholar
9. Eby, R.K., Ewing, R.C. and Birtcher, R.C., J. Mater. Res., 7 (1992) p. 30803102.Google Scholar
10. Morgan, G.B. VI and London, D., Amer. Mineral., 81 (1996) p. 11761185.Google Scholar
11. Walker, T.M. and Howitt, D.G., Scanning, 11 (1998) p. 511.Google Scholar
12. Kinoshita, C., Sonoda, T. and Manabe, A., Philos. Mag A, 78(3) (1998) p. 657670.Google Scholar