Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:26:45.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Activity Diagrams for Calcium/Hydrogen, Sodium/Hydrogen, and Potassium/Hydrogen, and H4 SiO4 and Their Relation to Reactions in Systems Containing Radioactive Waste Forms, Cement, and Rock in the Presence of Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Mary W. Barnes  and
Della M. Roy
Mary W. Barnes
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Della M. Roy
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

In order to identify reactions which can occur in systems containing nuclear waste forms, cement, and repository rock in the presence of water, activity diagrams were calculated from free energies for aluminosilicates and calcium silicates. Log (calcium activity)/(hydrogen activity)2 was plotted against log (H4 SiO4 activity) for reactions among calcium aluminum silicates for which free energies are available in the literature. Similar diagrams were made for sodium/hydrogen activity, and potassium/hydrogen activity. For calcium an activity diagram was constructed for the silicates.

Groundwater compositions from candidate repository sites in the Palo Duro Basin of Texas, the Delaware Basin of New Mexico, and the Nevada Test Site were plotted on these diagrams. Essentially all of these are shown to be in the calcium zeolite field as shown on the diagram for calcium in the absence of other cations. When considerable Mg and Fe are present in the water, other phases may replace the calcium zeolite in the pertinent region of the diagram. Chlorite is shown to be stable in this region at the Mg and pH level of the Ogallala if the chlorite is high in iron, and at the Mg and pH level of the Wolfcamp low- or high-Fe chlorites are stable. Potassium and sodium mineralrelationships fall in two categories, dilute waters and saline waters. Of the dilute waters, that from the Ogallala aquifer in the Palo Duro Basin, and most of the Nevada Test Site waters, including that from the proposed radwaste repository horizon, are in equilibrium with Na-beidellite and kaolinite. Boreholes at Yucca Flat and Mercury Valley at the Nevada Test Site, and shallow ground water from the Rolling Plains north and east of the Palo Duro Basin are in equilibrium with kaolinite. Of the saline waters, that from the Castile (deep in the Delaware Basin) is a kaolinite water. The brines from the Salado and Rustler formations are in equilibrium with kaolinite and possibly also with sodium-potassium zeolite and illite.

Leachates of cement and water, and cement, waste, and water were plotted on the calcium silicate activity diagram. These solutions are in equilibrium with calcium silicate hydrate hydrolysis reactions, with grossular and possibly with Ca-zeolites. Among the calcium silicates, calciumsilicate-hydrate gel (C-S-H gel) and tobermorite are the most likely candidates, but the thermodynamic data are not adequate to distinguish all the possibilities. The underlying assumptions are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 26: Symposium D – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII , 1983 , 697
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Garrels, R. and Christ, C.L., Solutions, Minerals, and Equilibria (Harper and Row, NY, 1965).Google Scholar
2. Hess, P.C., Phase Equilibria of Some Minerals in the K20-Na2 0-A12 O3- SiO2-H2O System at 25°C and 1 Atmosphere, Amer. J. Science 264, 289–309 (1966).10.2475/ajs.264.4.289Google Scholar
3. Robie, R.A., Hemingway, B.S., and Fisher, J.R., Thermodynamic Properties of Minerals and Related Substances at 298.15K and 1 Bar (105 Pascals) Pressure and at Higher Temperatures, Geol. Survey Bulletin 1452 (U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1978).Google Scholar
4. Haas, J.L., Robinson, G.R. Jr., and Hemingway, B.S., Thermodynamic Tabulations for Selected Phases in the System CaO-A12O3-SiO2-H2O at 101.325 kPa (1 atm) Between 273.15 and 1800K, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 10, 575 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Hemingway, B.S., Baas, J.L. Jr., and Robinson, G.R. Jr., Thermodynamic Properties of Selected Minerals in the System A12O3-CaO-SiO2-H2O at 298.15K and 1 bar (105 pascals) Pressure and at Higher Temperatures, Geol. Surey Bull. 1544 (Washington, 1982).Google Scholar
6. Robinson, G.S. Jr., Haas, J.L. Jr., Shafer, C.M., and Haselton, H.T. Jr., Thermodynamic and Thermophysical Properties of Selected Phases in the MgO-SiO2-H2O-CO2, CaO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O-CO2. and Fe-FeO-Fe2O3-SiO2 Chemical Systems, with Special Emphasis on the Properties of Basalts and Their Mineral Components (U.S.G.S. Open File Report, 1982), DRAFT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. D'Ans, J. and Eick, H., Zement-Kalk-Gips 6, 197 (1953).Google Scholar
8. Norton, D., Chemical Mass Transfer in the Rio Tanama System, West Central Puerto Rico, Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 38, 267–277 (1974).10.1016/0016-7037(74)90110-0Google Scholar
9. Nikushchenko, V.M., Khotimchenko, V.S., Rumyantsev, P.F., and Kalinin, A.I., Determination of the Standard Free Energies of Formation of Calcium Hydraluminates, Cement and Concrete Research 3, 625 (1973).10.1016/0008-8846(73)90099-9Google Scholar
10. Drever, J.I., Chemical Weathering in a Subtropical Igneous Terrain, Rio Ameca, Mexico, J. Sedimentary Petrology 41, 951–961 (1971).Google Scholar
11. Mchedlov-Petrossian, O.P., Ed., Thermodynamics of Silicates (Stroyizdat, Moscow, 1972), in Russian.Google Scholar
12. Log, k for Ca-beidellite-kaolinite from Norton [8]; free energy of formation of Robinson et al. [6].Google Scholar
13. Kittrick, J.A., ‘Solubility of Two High-Mg and Two High Fe-Chlorites Using Multiple Equilibria,’ Clays and Clay Minerals, 30, pp. 167–179 (1982).10.1346/CCMN.1982.0300302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Stream compositions from Drever [10]; free energy of formation of kaolinite from Robinson [6]. free energy of formation of Na-beidellite from [16].Google Scholar
15. Activity of Ca, Al from Nikuschenko [9]; solubility is from D'Ans and Eick [7]; free energy of formation of gibbsite from Hemingway [5].Google Scholar
16. Log k for Na-beidellite-kaolinite from Hess [2], confirmed by water compositions of Drever [10].Google Scholar
17. Log k for phillipsite-k-feldspar from Hess [2]; free energy of formation of microcline from Robie et al. [3].Google Scholar
18. Johnson, G.K., Flotow, H.E., and O'Hare, P.A.G., ‘Thermodynamic Studies of Zeolites: natrolite, mesolite, and scolecite,’ Am. Mineralogist 68, 1134–1145 (1983).Google Scholar
19. Free energy of hydration from Brunauer and Greenberg [20]; free energy of formation from Mchedlov-Petrossian [11].Google Scholar
20. Brunauer, S. and Greenberg, S.A., Chemistry of Cement, Vol. I (U.S. Nat. Bur. Standards, IV Internat. Symp., Washington, DC, 1960), pp. 135–165.Google Scholar
21. Stone and Webster, Area Geological Characterization Report for the Palo Duro and Dalhart Basins, Texas (DOE/CH/10140-1, 1982).Google Scholar
22. Eagle, G.W. and Baldwin, J.S., National Uranium Resource Evaluation Program, Hydrogeochemical and Stream Sediment Reconnaisance Basic Data for Plainview NTMS Quadrangle, TX (GJBX-92, Open File Report, Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Oak Ridge, TN, 1978).Google Scholar
23. Sewell, J.M. and Czyscinski, K.S., Interpretation of Palo Duro Groundwater Geochemical Data (Data Reference 6, Bendix Field Engineering Corp., Grand Junction, CO, 1982).Google Scholar
24. Powers, Dennis W., Lambert, Steven J., Sue-Ellen Shaffer, , Hill, Leslie R., and Weart, Wendell D., Eds., Draft Site Characterization Report for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), Southeastern New Mexico, V. 2 (Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1978).Google Scholar
25. Winograd, I.J. and Thordarson, W., Hydrogeologic and Hydrogeochemical Framework, South-Central Great Basin, Nevada-California, with Special Reference to the Nevada Test Site (Geological Survey Professional Paper 712-C, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1975).Google Scholar
26. Desert Research Institute Water Resources Center, Reno, Nevada Water Analysis Report of Sept. 16, 1981.Google Scholar
27. Vidale, R., personal communication (1982).Google Scholar
28. Raines, G.E., Rickertsen, L.D., Claiborne, H.C., McElroy, J.L., and Lynch, R.W., Development of Reference Conditions for Geologic Repositories for Nuclear Waste in the USA, in: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management 3, Moore, J.G., Ed. (Plenum, NY, 1981), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
29. Hay, R.L. and Sheppard, R.A., Zeolites in Open Systems, in: Mineralogy and Geology of Natural Zeolites, Ch. 5, Mumpton, F.A., Ed., Reviews in Mineralogy Series, Ribbe, P.H., Ed. (The Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1977).Google Scholar
30. Bish, D., Vaniman, D., Byers, F. Jr., and Broxton, D., LA-9321-MS (1983).Google Scholar
31. Hedberg, L.L. and Parry, W.T., Clay Mineralogy at the Brine-Sediment Interface in the South Arm of Great Salt Lake, Utah (Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey affiliated with the College of Mines and Mineral Industries, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 1971), Special Studies 35.Google Scholar
32. Fritz, P., Barker, J.F., and Gale, J.E., Geochemistry and Isotope Hydrology of Groundwaters in the Stripa Granite, Results and Preliminary Interpretation (Swedish-American Cooperative Program on Radioactive Waste Storage in Mined Caverns in Crystalline Rock, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, LBL-8285, SAC-12, UC-70, 1979).Google Scholar
33. Barnes, M.W., Scheetz, B.E., Wakeley, L.D., Atkinson, S.D., and Roy, D.M., Stability of I and Sr Radiophases in Cement Matrices, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. 6, Topp, S.V., Ed. (Elsevier, North-Holland, NY, 1982), pp. 147–154.Google Scholar
34. Vance, E.R., Scheetz, B.E., Barnes, M.W., and Bodnar, B.J., Studies of Pollucite, in: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. 6, Topp, S.V., Ed. (Elsevier, North-Holland, NY, 1982), pp. 31–35.Google Scholar
35. Roy, D.M., Scheetz, B.E., Wakeley, L.D., and Barnes, M.W., Leach Characterization of Cement Encapsulated Wastes, Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management 3, 35–42 (1982).10.1016/0191-815X(82)90026-2Google Scholar
36. Barnes, M.W. and Roy, D.M., The Buffering Mechanisms in Leaching of Composites of Cement with Radioactive Waste, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management. Vol. 15, Brookins, D., Ed. (Elsevier, North-Holland, NY, 1983), pp. 159–166.Google Scholar
37. Seki, Y., Oki, Y., Matsuda, T., Mikami, K., and Okamura, K., Metamorphism in the Tanazawa Mountains, Central Japan, J. Assoc. Jap. Mn. Petr. Econ. Geol. 61, 1–25, 50–75 (1969).10.2465/ganko1941.61.1Google Scholar