Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:05:23.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Z-Contrast Imaging of Grain-Boundary Core Structures in Semiconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Interest in semiconductor grain boundaries relates to the development of polycrystalline materials for photovoltaics and integrated-circuit interconnects. Although these structures are responsible for deleterious electrical effects, there are few experimental techniques available to study them at the required atomic scale. Therefore models of the physical processes occurring at grain boundaries have necessarily taken a macroscopic approach. Fortunately recent developments have resulted in tools that provide unprecedented glimpses into these interfaces and that will allow us to address anew the connection between grain-boundary structure and properties.

Z-Contrast Imaging

When exploring the unknown, we rely heavily on our eyes (incoherent imaging) to provide a direct image of a new object. In order to explore the unforeseen atomic configurations present at extended defects in materials, it again would be desirable if one could obtain a directly interpretable image of the unfamiliar structures present in the defect cores. Z-contrast electron microscopy provides such a view with both atomic resolution and compositional sensitivity.

This high-resolution imaging technique differs from conventional high-resolution phase-contrast imaging. The phase-contrast technique produces a coherent image, an interference pattern formed by recombining the waves diffracted by the specimen. In the Z-contrast technique, the image is incoherent; it is essentially a map of the scattering power of the specimen. Additionally as was first determined by Lord Rayleigh, the incoherent mode of image formation has double the resolving power of the coherent mode.

Type
Nanoscale Characterization of Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For example, see Pennycook, S. J., in Handbook of Microscopy Methods II, edited by Amelinckx, S., van Dyck, D., van Landuyt, J., and van Tendeloo, G. (VCH, Weinheim, 1997) p. 595.Google Scholar
2.Rayleigh, Lord, Philos. Mag. 42 (1896) p. 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Pennycook, S.J. and Jesson, D.E., Acta Metall. Mater. 40 (1992) p. S149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Jesson, D.E. and Pennycook, S.J., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 449 (1995) p. 272.Google Scholar
5.Quincke, G., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 76 (1905) p. 431.Google Scholar
6.Taylor, G.I., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 145 (1934) p. 388.Google Scholar
7.Burgers, J.M., Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. V. Wet. Amsterdam 42 (1939) p. 293.Google Scholar
8.Sutton, A.P. and Vitek, V., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 309 (1983) pp. 1, 37, 55.Google Scholar
9.Bishop, G.H. and Chalmers, B., Scripta Metall. 2 (1968) p. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Krivanek, O.L., Isoda, S., and Kobayashi, K., Philos. Mag. 36 (1977) p. 931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hornstra, J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 5 (1958) p. 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Liu, F., Mostoller, M., Milman, V., Chisholm, M.F., and Kaplan, T., Phys. Rev. 51 (1995) p. 17192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. For example, see Werner, J., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 104 (1989) p. 63.Google Scholar
14.Mostoller, M., Chisholm, M.F., and Kaplan, T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) p. 1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Hornstra, J., Physica 25 (1959) p. 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Chisholm, M.F., Maiti, A., Pennycook, S.J., and Pantelides, S.T., Science in press.Google Scholar
17.Bourret, A., Rouviere, J.L., and Penisson, J.M., Acta Crystallogr. Sec. A 44 (1988) p. 838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Kohyama, M., Yamamoto, R., Ebata, Y., and Kinoshita, M., J. Phys. C 21 (1988) p. 3205.Google Scholar
19.Paxton, A.T. and Sutton, A.P., J. Phys. C 21 (1988) p. L481.Google Scholar
20.Arias, T.A. and Joannopoulos, J.D., Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) p. 4525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Maiti, A., Chisholm, M.F., Pennycook, S.J., and Pantelides, S.T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) p. 1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar