Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:51:06.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Non-Periodic Lattice Model for Crystals in Nephila clavipes Major Ampullate Silk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Brad L. Thiel  and
Christopher Viney
Get access

Extract

Defects play a significant role in determining the physical and thermodynamic behaviors of a material. This precept can be especially helpful when one attempts to interpret the engineering properties of a biological material in the context of its complex, hierarchical microstructure. An excellent example of an impressive engineering material used by nature is silk, which has a composite microstructure assembled from one or more protein polymers. Spiders, aided by several million years of evolution, have succeeded in producing a polymer fiber [major ampullate silk (MAS)] with a strength-to-weight ratio exceeding that of nearly all synthetic materials. Even the exceptions—specialty fibers such as carbon, silica, and some variants of Kevlar—pale in comparison when toughness (energy required to bring about failure) is taken into account; they are relatively brittle and lack the viscoelastic extensibility of MAS. When one considers that spiders produce this naturally biodegradable material under ambient conditions and with an aqueous solvent, the feat becomes even more impressive. It is clear that the spider could be an excellent instructor in both polymer processing and microstructural design.

where the α-carbon is bonded to a functional “R” group that distinguishes the monomer as being one of the 20 commonly occurring natural a-amino acids.

Type
Defects in Polymers
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 20 , Issue 9 , September 1995 , pp. 52 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Gosline, J.M., DeMont, M.E., and Denny, M.W., Endeavour 10 (1986) p. 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lewis, R.V., Acc. Chem. Res. 25 (1992) p. 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Mello, C.M., Senecal, K., Yeung, B., Vouros, P., and Kaplan, D., in Silk Polymers: Materials Science and Biotechnology, edited by Kaplan, D., Adams, W.W., Farmer, B., and Viney, C. (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1994) p. 67.Google Scholar
4.Vollrath, F., Sci. Am. 266 (3) (1992) p. 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Lucas, F., Shaw, J.T.B., and Smith, S.G., J. Textile Inst. 46 (1955) p. T440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Strydom, D.J., Haylett, T., and Stead, R.H., Biochemical and Biophysical Res. Commun. 79 (1977) p. 932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Mita, K., Ichimura, S., Zama, M., and James, T.C., J. Mol. Biology 203 (1988) p. 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Marsh, R.E., Corev, R.B., and Pauling, L., Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 16 (1955) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Nakamae, K., Nishino, T., and Ohkubo, H., Polymer 30 (1989) p. 1,243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Becker, M.A., Mahoney, D.V., Lenhert, P.G., Eby, R.K., Kaplan, D., and Adams, W.W., in Silk Polymers: Materials Science and Biotechnology, edited by Kaplan, D., Adams, W.W., Farmer, B., and Viney, C. (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1994) p. 185.Google Scholar
11.Thiel, B.L., Kunkel, D.D., and Viney, C., Biopolymers 34 (1994) p. 1,089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Thiel, B., Kunkel, D., Guess, K., and Viney, C., in Biomolecular Materials by Design, edited by Alper, M., Bayley, H., Kaplan, D., and Navia, M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 330, Pittsburgh, 1994) p. 21.Google Scholar
13.Thiel, B.L., PhD dissertation, University of Washington, 1995.Google Scholar
14.Thiel, B.L. and Viney, C., in Industrial Biotechnological Polymers, edited by Gebelein, C. and Carraher, C. Jr. (Technomic, Lancaster, PA) in press.Google Scholar
15.Xu, M. and Lewis, R.V., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 87 (1990) p. 7,120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hinman, M.B. and Lewis, R.V., J. Biological Chem. 267 (1992) p. 19,320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Lombardi, S.J. and Kaplan, D.L., J. Arachnology 18 (1990) p. 297.Google Scholar
18.Work, R.W. and Morosoff, N., Textile Res. J. 52 (1982) p. 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Windle, A.H., Viney, C., Golombok, R., Donald, A.M., and Mitchell, G.R., Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 79 (1985) p. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Viney, C. and Windle, A.H., Mol. Cryst. liq. Cryst. 148 (1987) p. 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Hanna, S. and Windle, A.H., Polymer 29 (1988) p. 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Tillinghast, E.K. and Townley, M., in Ecophysiology of Spiders, edited by Nentwig, W. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987) p. 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Viney, C., Huber, A.E., Dunaway, D.L., Kerkam, K., and Case, S.T., in Silk Polymers: Materials Science and Biotechnology, edited by Kaplan, D., Adams, W.W., Farmer, B., and Viney, C. (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1994) p. 120.Google Scholar
24.Marsh, R.E., Corey, R.B., and Pauling, L., Acta Crystallogr. 8 (1955) p. 710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Thiel, B.L. and Viney, C. (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar