Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:58:07.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Measurement of Residual Stresses Using Neutron Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Residual stresses are common in engineering materials. They are elastic stresses that exist in the absence of external forces and are produced through the differential action of plastic flow, thermal contraction, and/or changes in volume created by phase transformations. Differential plastic flow can occur during the forming of a part. For example, the grinding of a surface will plastically extend a thin surface layer relative to the underlying material through frictional forces. This tends to throw the near-surface region into compression, which is balanced by a tensile stress through the bulk of the part. In such a situation, the requirements of force equilibrium lead to a rather high level of compressive stress in the near-surface region and a low level of tensile stress through the bulk. Differential thermal contraction often occurs during the nonuniform cooling of a large part, in the vicinity of welds, and between the matrix and reinforcement phases of a composite. Differential volume changes occur during the precipitation of second phases, i.e., the atomic volume of the precipitating phase generally differs from that of the host matrix. If it is larger, the second phase is placed in compression, with the matrix in tension, and vice versa.

The residual stress states discussed in the previous paragraph are of two basic types: macrostress and microstress. Residual macrostresses are long-range relative to the scale of the microstructure––that is, they extend continuously across a part. Residual stresses arising from forming and joining are of this type. They generally vary with position and are extensive in nature. A plate with compressive residual stresses on the flat surfaces will deflect if the compressive region on one surface is removed. Destructive stress measurement techniques such as hole drilling or strain gauging and sectioning can be used to determine residual macrostresses.

Type
Neutron Scattering
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Noyan, I.C. and Cohen, J.B., Residual Stress (Springer Verlag, New York, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bacon, G.E., Neutron Diffraction, 3rd ed. (Oxford Univ. Press, 1975).Google Scholar
3.Cullity, B.D., Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, 2nd. ed. (Addison-Wesley, 1978).Google Scholar
4.Schmank, M.J. and Krawitz, A.D., Metall. Trans. 13A (1982) p. 10691076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Pintschovius, L., Jung, V., Macherauch, E., and Vohringer, O., Mater. Sci. Eng. 61 (1983) p. 4350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Prask, H.J. and Choi, C.S., J. Nuc. Mater. 136 (1984) p. 124131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Holden, T.M., Powell, B.M., Dolling, G., and MacEwen, S.R., Proc. 5th Riso Intl. Symposium on Metallurgy and Materials Science (1984) p. 291294.Google Scholar
8.Holt, R.A., Dolling, G., Powell, B.M., Holden, T.M., and Winegar, J.E., Proc. 5th Riso Intl. Symposium on Metallurgy and Materials Science (1984) p. 295300.Google Scholar
9.Allen, A.J., Hutchings, M.T., Windsor, C.G., and Andreani, C., Adv. in Phys. 34 (1985) p. 445473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Pintschovius, L., Macherauch, E., and Scholtes, B., Mater. Sci. Eng. 84 (1986) p. 163170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Allen, A.J., Hutchings, M.T., and Rainey, V.S., Non-Destructive Testing, Proc. 4th European Conference (Pergamon Press, 1987) p. 18081817.Google Scholar
12.Smith, D.J., Leggatt, R.H., Webster, G.A., MacGillivray, H.J., Webster, P.J., and Mills, G., J. Strain Analysis 23 (1988) p. 201211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.MacEwen, S.R., Faber, J., and Turner, A.P.L., Acta Metall. 31 (1983) p. 657676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Krawitz, A.D., Roberts, R., and Faber, J., Science of Hard Materials (Inst. of Physics Conf. Series No. 75, 1986) p. 577589.Google Scholar
15.Krawitz, A.D., Reichel, D.G., and Hitterman, R.L., Mater. Sci. Eng. A119 (1989) p. 127134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Majumdar, S., Kupperman, D., and Singh, J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71 (1988) p. 858863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Majumdar, S. and Kupperman, D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (1989) p. 312313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Krawitz, A.D., Crapenhoft, M.L., Reichel, D.G., and Warren, R., Mater. Sci. Eng. A105/106 (1988) p. 275281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Allen, A.J., Bourke, M., Hutchings, M.T., Krawitz, A.D., and Windsor, C.G., Residual Stresses in Sci. & Tech., edited by Macherauch, E. and Hauk, V., DGM Verlag, Vol. 1 (1987) p. 151.Google Scholar
20.Rudnik, P.J., Krawitz, A.D., Reichel, D.G., and Cohen, J.B., Adv. in X-Ray Analysis 31 (Plenum, 1988) p. 245253.Google Scholar
21.Butler, B.D., Murray, B.C., Reichel, D.G., and Krawitz, A.D., Adv. in X-Ray Analysis 32 (Plenum Press, 1989) p. 389395.Google Scholar
22.Krawitz, A.D., Butler, B., Rudnik, P., and Cohen, J.B., Adv. in X-Ray Analysis 29 (Plenum, 1986) p. 163172.Google Scholar
23.Jorgensen, J.D., Faber, J. Jr, Carpenter, J.M., Crawford, R.K., Haumann, J.R., Hitterman, R.L., Kleb, R., Ostrowski, G.E., Rotella, F.J., and Worlton, T.G., J. Appl. Cryst. 22 (1989) p. 321333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Holden, T.M., Root, J.H., Fidleris, V., Holt, R.A., and Roy, G., Mater. Sci. Forum 27/28 (1988) p. 359370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Leung, K.C and Pick, R.J., Federal Gov. of Canada, DSS File #01 ST 23440-2-9060 (1986).Google Scholar
26.Ledbetter, H.M. and Kim, S.A., J. Mater. Res. 3 (1988) p. 4044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Majumdar, S. and Krawitz, A.D., Mater. Sci. Eng. A123 (1990) p. L1L3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Seol, K. and Krawitz, A.D., Mater. Sci. Eng., A127 (1990) p. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar