Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T12:34:34.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Piezoresistive characterization of graphene/metakaolin based geopolymeric mortar composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2017

C. Lamuta ,
L. Bruno ,
S. Candamano  and
L. Pagnotta
C. Lamuta*
Affiliation:
Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA University of Calabria, DIMEG, Ponte P. Bucci, cubo 44C, 87030 Arcavacata di Rende (CS)
L. Bruno
Affiliation:
University of Calabria, DIMEG, Ponte P. Bucci, cubo 44C, 87030 Arcavacata di Rende (CS)
S. Candamano
Affiliation:
University of Calabria, DIATIC, Ponte P. Bucci, cubo 44A, 87030 Arcavacata di Rende (CS)
L. Pagnotta
Affiliation:
University of Calabria, DIMEG, Ponte P. Bucci, cubo 44C, 87030 Arcavacata di Rende (CS)
*
*Corresponding author: caterinalamuta@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Geopolymers are recently developed ceramic materials produced by alkaline activation of thermally activated natural materials such as metakaolin. Due to their promising application in the field of structural components, the presence of a piezoresistive effect is a very useful property for such materials because it allows the real time self-monitoring of civil infrastructures. As observed for cement-based materials, the use of a conductive filler can enhance the piezoresistive response by avoiding measuring issues related to the electrical polarization. In this work we present preliminary results about the piezoresistive characterization of a metakaolin based geopolymeric mortar filled with graphene nanoplatelets. Composites with different graphene weight concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1%) were produced and the gauge factor (the ratio between the electrical resistance variation and the imposed strain) was calculated by means of dynamic four-probe resistance measurements. Very high gauge factor values (in the range of 1000-2000) were recorded and they can vary according to the dispersion quality of the graphene nanoplatelets into the ceramic matrix.

Keywords

ceramic2D materialspiezoresponse
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 2 , Issue 61: International Materials Research Congress XXV , 2017 , pp. 3773 - 3779
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ou, J., Proc. SPIE 5851 (2004), 147–162.Google Scholar
Masri, S.F. et al. , Smart Mater. Struct. 13(6) (2004), 1269–1283.Google Scholar
Chong, K.P., J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 9 (11) (1999), 892–898.Google Scholar
De Backer, H., De Corte, W., Van Bogaert, P., 45 (12) (2003), 822–826, 830.Google Scholar
Meizbacher, C.I., Kersey, A.D., Friebele, E.J., Smart Mater. Struct. 5 (2) (1999), 196–208.Google Scholar
Song, G., Gu, H., Mo, Y.L., Hsu, T., Dhonde, H., Zhu, R.H., Proc. SPIE 5765 (2005), 108–119.Google Scholar
Li, H., Liu, Z.-q., Li, Z.-w., Ou, J.-p., Adv. Struct. Eng. 7 (6) (2004), 495–501.Google Scholar
Inada, H., Okuhara, Y., Kumagai, H., Proc. SPIE 5391 (2004), 609–617.Google Scholar
Davidovits, J., Geopolymer Chemistry and Application (3rd ed.) Institute Geopolymer, Saint Quentin, France 2008.Google Scholar
Alomayri, T., Shaikh, F.U.A., I.M., Mater Design, 57 (2014), 360–365.Google Scholar
Yodsudjai, W. et al. , in Development, and Applications of Engineering Ceramics and Composites: Ceramic Transactions, New York 2010, vol. 215.Google Scholar
Hanzlicekw, T., Steinerova, M., Vondrakova, , J. Am. Ceram. Soc. , 2006, Vol 89(3), 968–970.Google Scholar
Davidovits, J., Davidovics, M., Proc. 36th Int SAMPE symposium (1991), 1939–1949.Google Scholar
Candamano, S. et al. , Chemical Engineering Research and Design 96, (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, S. and Chung, D. D. L., ACI Materials Journal/March-April 2007, 171–179.Google Scholar
Coppola, L., Buoso, A., Corazza, F., IX INSTM CONFERENCE, 2013.Google Scholar
Baoguo, H., Guofu, Q., Haifeng, J., DOI 10.1007/s11595-012-0542-z.Google Scholar
Chung, D. D. L., Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 00, (2002).Google Scholar
Han, B., Ou, J., Sensors and Actuators A 138 (2007), 294–298.Google Scholar
Kim, H.K., Park, I.S., Lee, H.K., Composite Structures 116 (2014), 713–719.Google Scholar
Saafi, M. et al. , Smart Mater. Struct. 23 (2014), 065006 (10pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardjito, D., Wallah, S.E., Sumajouw, D.M., Rangan, B.V., ACI Mater. J. 101 (2004).Google Scholar
Galao, O., Baeza, F.J., Zornoza, E., Garcés, P., Cement & Concrete Composites 46 (2014) 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L et al. , (2008), J Am Ceram Soc 91:1346–1349.Google Scholar
Terauds, K et al. (2010), J Eur Ceram Soc 30:2203–2207.Google Scholar
Riedel, R et al. (2010), J Am Ceram Soc 93:920–924.Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Zhang, L, Fan, Y, Jiang, D, An, L (2009), J Mater Sci 44(11):2814–2819.Google Scholar