Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:34:29.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MINIMAL VARIATION OF DEFECT STRUCTURE DUE TO THE ORDER OF ROOM TEMPERATURE HYDROGEN ISOTOPE IMPLANTATION AND SELF-ION IRRADIATION IN NICKEL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2016

Brittany Muntifering ,
Jianmin Qu  and
Khalid Hattar
Brittany Muntifering*
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, U.S.A. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, U.S.A.
Jianmin Qu
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, U.S.A. Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, U.S.A.
Khalid Hattar
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, U.S.A.
*
*(Email: brmunti@sandia.gov)
Get access

Abstract

The formation and stability of radiation-induced defects in structural materials in reactor environments significantly effects their integrity and performance. Hydrogen, which may be present in significant quantities in future reactors, may play an important role in defect evolution. To characterize the effect of hydrogen on cascade damage evolution, in-situ TEM self-ion irradiation and deuterium implantation was performed, both sequentially and concurrently, on nickel. This paper presents preliminary results characterizing dislocation loop formation and evolution during room temperature deuterium implantation and self-ion irradiation and the consequence of the sequence of irradiation. Hydrogen isotope implantation at room temperature appears to have little or no effect on the final dislocation loop structures that result from self-ion irradiation, regardless of the sequence of irradiation. Tilting experiments emphasize the importance of precise two-beam conditions for characterizing defect size and structure.

Keywords

ion-implantationion-solid interactionsnuclear materials
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 42: Energy and Environment , 2016 , pp. 2887 - 2892
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Lewis, F. A., Pure and Applied Chemistry 62.11 (1990): 2091–2096.Google Scholar
Marian, Jaime, et al. , Journal of Nuclear Materials (2014).Google Scholar
Lawrence, Samantha K., et al. , JOM 66.8 (2014): 1383–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattar, K., Bufford, D. C., and Buller, D. L., Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B, vol.338, pp. 56–65, Nov 1 2014.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J.F., Ziegler, M. D., and Biersack, J. P., Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B-Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 268, pp. 1818–1823, 2010.Google Scholar
Niwase, K., Ezawa, T., Tanabe, T., Kiritani, M., and Fujita, F. E., Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 203, pp. 56–66, Jul 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ono, K., Sakamoto, R., Muroga, T., and Yoshida, N., Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 233, pp. 1040–1044, Oct 1996.Google Scholar
Was, Gary. “Fundamentals of Radiation Materials Science: Metals and Alloys." University of Michigan (2007).Google Scholar
Robertson, I. M., Engineering Fracture Mechanics 68.6 (2001): 671–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raspopova, G. A. and Arbuzov, V. L., Physics of Metals and Metallography, vol. 107, pp. 58–67, Jan 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takagi, I., Yoshida, K., Shin, K., and Higashi, K., Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B-Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 84, pp. 393–399, 1994.Google Scholar
Arbuzov, V. L., Raspopova, G. A., Danilov, S. E., Druzhkov, A. P., and Zouev, Y. N., Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 283, pp. 849–853, Dec 2000.Google Scholar
Yoshida, N., Yasukawa, M., and Muroga, T., Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 205, pp. 385–393, Oct 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar