Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:23:18.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure Characterization of Ni-75 at.% Al Raney Type Alloy as a Result of Cooling Rate and Chromium Doping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2019

Naveed Hussain*
Affiliation:
School of Chemical & Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Andrew M Mullis
Affiliation:
School of Chemical & Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Jennifer S Forrester
Affiliation:
School of Chemical & Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
*
Get access

Abstract

The effect of cooling rate on the phase composition of gas atomized Raney type catalysts was studied using the Ni-75 at.% Al composition. The resulting particles were sieved into 3 standard size fractions and analysed using XRD with Rietveld refinement: as expected the three phases, Al₃Ni₂, Al₃Ni, and Al-Al₃Ni eutectic were identified. Differing phase compositions in the 3 size ranges were identified offering a possible explanation for varying catalytic activity with cooling rate, the higher cooling rates experienced by the smaller droplets allow less time for the peritectic conversion of Al₃Ni₂ to Al₃Ni to proceed. This in turn results in a more Al-rich residual liquid, increasing the volume fraction of eutectic. This was further confirmed when analysing the microstructure using SEM backscatter imaging. Al₃Ni₂ was found to be encased in a shell of Al₃Ni characteristic of peritectic reactions. The remainder of the alloy was found to consist of Al-Al₃Ni eutectic. The SEM backscatter imaging also indicated that the larger particles displayed and a more globular structure than smaller particles. Similar Raney type Ni-75 at.% Al doped with 1.5 at.% Cr were synthesised using the same method and sieved into the same 3 standard size fractions. It was found that the Cr doped alloys exhibited a more dendritic character than the undoped samples in the corresponding size fraction, although the material still displayed an increasingly dendritic character with increasing cooling rate. The phase composition found by Rietveld refinement also followed a similar trend to the undoped samples with decreasing amounts of Al₃Ni formed at the higher cooling rates. However, significant amounts of an additional phase, Al₁₃Cr₂, were also observed. Rietveld refinement found that a larger amount of Al₁₃Cr₂ was present than could be accounted for by the addition of 1.5 at.% Cr . This can be explained by the substitution of Ni onto the Cr lattice, as confirmed by Rietveld refinement. Al₁₃Cr₂ was found to be located mostly at the boundary of the Al₃Ni and Al-Al₃Ni eutectic phases during elemental mapping and quantitative image analysis of backscattered electron micrographs. This indicates that precipitation of Al₁₃Cr₂ is towards the end of the solidification process. The relatively large amounts of the Al-rich Al₁₃Cr₂ may explain the enhanced catalytic activity observed following leaching of Cr-doped Raney catalysts.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

Ellner, M., Kattner, U. and Predel, B., Journal of the Less Common Metals. 87 (2), 305, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devred, F., Gieske, A. H., Adkins, N., Dahlborg, U., Bao, C. M., Calvo-Dahlborg, M., Bakker, J. W. and Nieuwenhuys, B. E., Applied Catalysis A: General. 356, 154-161, (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lengsdorf, R., Holland-Moritz, D. and Herlach, D. M., Acta Materialia. 62, 365-367, (2009).Google Scholar
Devred, F., IMPRESS project, (2004).Google Scholar
Bonnier, J. M., Damon, J. P. and Masson, J., Applied Catalysis. 42 (2), 285-297, (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koscielski, T., Bonnier, J. M., Damon, J. P. and Masson, J., Applied Catalysis. 49 (1), 91-99, (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisarek, M., Łukaszewski, M., Winiarek, P., Kedzierzawski, P. and Janik-Czachor, M., Catalysis Communications. 10, 213-216, (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullis, A. M., Farrell, L., Cochrane, R. F. and Adkins, N. J., Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 44B (4), 992-998, (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMPRESS, Intermetallic Processing in Relation to Earth and Space Solidification, EU Framework VI (Integrated) Project # NMP3-CT-2004-500635-2.Google Scholar
Larson, A. C. and Von Dreele, R. B., General Structure Analysis System (GSAS), Los Alamos National Laboratory, (2004).Google Scholar
Toby, B. H., Journal of Applied Crystallography. 34, 210-213, (2001).10.1107/S0021889801002242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. H., Dinsdale, A. T., Gisby, J. A., Robinson, J. A. J. and Martin, S. M., CALPHAD. 26 (2), 229-271, (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M. J., Acta Crystallographica. 13 (3), 257, (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar