Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T13:15:22.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integration of the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: An Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2020

François Diaz-Maurin Open the ORCID record for François Diaz-Maurin [Opens in a new window]  and
Rodney C. Ewing
François Diaz-Maurin*
Affiliation:
Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Amphos 21 Consulting SL, C/ Venezuela 103, 08019 Barcelona, Spain
Rodney C. Ewing
Affiliation:
Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
*
*(Email: francois.diaz@amphos21.com)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent efforts have been made toward the integration of the back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the United States. The back-end integration seeks to address several management challenges: 1) current storage practices are not optimized for transport and disposal; 2) the impact of interim storage on the disposal strategy needs to be evaluated; and 3) the back-end is affected by—and affects—nuclear fuel cycle and energy policy choices. The back-end integration accounts for the various processes of nuclear waste management—onsite storage, consolidated storage, transport and geological disposal. Ideally, these processes should be fully coupled so that benefits and impacts can be assessed at the level of the full fuel cycle. The paper summarizes the causes and consequences of the absence of integration at the back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the U.S., critically reviews ongoing integration efforts, and suggests a framework that would support the back-end integration.

Keywords

waste managementnuclear materialssocietyenvironment
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 5 , Issue 5-6: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XLIII , 2020 , pp. 253 - 264
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020

References

U.S. NWTRB, Survey of National Programs for Managing High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: A Report to Congress and the Secretary of Energy (United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Arlington, VA, 2009).Google Scholar
Carter, J., Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste Inventory Report (Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, South Carolina, USA, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rechard, R.P., Price, L.L., and Kalinina, E.A., Integrating Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from Generation to Disposal (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2015), p. 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (2019).Google Scholar
Bonano, E.J., Kalinina, E.A., and Swift, P.N., MRS Advances 3, 991 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, J., Duro, L., and Diaz-Maurin, F., in Advances in Nuclear Fuel Chemistry 1st Edition edited Piro, byM. (Woodhead Publishing, 2020), p. 450.Google Scholar
Ewing, R.C. and Weber, W.J., in Fundamentals of Materials for Energy and Environmental Sustainability edited by Ginley, D.S. and Cahen, D. (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Maurin, F., Sun, H.C., Yu, J., and Ewing, R.C., MRS Advances 4, 959 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Maurin, F. and Ewing, R.C., Sustainability 10, 4390 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reset Steering Committee, Reset of America’s Nuclear Waste Management Strategy and Policy (Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2018).Google Scholar
Johnson, C.A., Radioactive Waste Management: A Bibliography for the Integrated Data Base Program (Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA), 1981).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, Integrated Data Base Report-1996: U.S. Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste Inventories, Projections, and Characteristics (Washington, D.C., 1997), p. 263.Google Scholar
Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, Report to the Secretary of Energy (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., 2013), p. 14.Google Scholar
Danker, W.J. and Williams, J.R., in High Level Radioactive Waste Management (American Nuclear Society, Las Vegas, NV (USA), 1990).Google Scholar
Jarrell, J., in (U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Washington, D.C., 2016), p. 29.Google Scholar
Joseph, R., Craig, B., Cumberland, R.M., Trail, C., Aubin, J. St., Olson, C., Vander Wal, L., Vanderzee, E., Jarrell, J., and Kalinina, E., in (Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States), Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 2019).Google Scholar
Abkowitz, M. and Bickford, E., in (American Nuclear Society, Charleston, SC, USA, 2015).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy’s Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project, Small Standardized Transportation, Aging, and Disposal (STAD) Canister System For Spent Nuclear Fuel Management (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2015), p. 2.Google Scholar
Howard, R., in (U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Washington, D.C., 2013), p. 20.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, Designing a Consent-Based Siting Process: Summary of Public Input (Washington, D.C., 2016), p. 98.Google Scholar
Dewoghélaëre, J., Hériard-Dubreuil, G., and Marignac, Y., Civil Society Views on the Content and Governance of a Joint Research Programme (JOPRAD - Towards a Joint Programming on Radioactive Waste Disposal. (EU project H2020-Euratom-653951), Paris, France, 2017), p. 11.Google Scholar
Brunnengräber, A. and Di Nucci, M.R., editors, Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance: An International Comparison (Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, B.D., Andrén, M., and Strandberg, U., Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1, 13 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliskey, A., Alessa, L., Wandersee, S., Williams, P., Trammell, J., Powell, J., Grunblatt, J., and Wipfli, M., Sustain Sci 12, 293 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayumi, K. and Giampietro, M., Ecological Indicators 47, 50 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giampietro, M., Aspinall, R.J., Ramos-Martin, J., and Bukkens, S.G.F., editors, Resource Accounting for Sustainability Assessment: The Nexus between Energy, Food, Water and Land Use (Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Maurin, F. and Giampietro, M., Energy 49, 162 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porte, T.R. and Metlay, D.S., Public Administration Review 56, 341 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S.E., Stoutenborough, J.W., and Vedlitz, A., Understanding Trust in Government: Environmental Sustainability, Fracking, and Public Opinion in American Politics (Routledge, New York, NY, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, M., Nuclear Waste Management, Nuclear Power, and Energy Choices: Public Preferences, Perceptions, and Trust (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).Google Scholar
Slovic, P., Flynn, J.H., and Layman, M., Science 254, 1603 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Maurin, F., Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 74, 335 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, T.M., Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1995).Google Scholar
Chifari, R., Lo Piano, S., Bukkens, S.G.F., and Giampietro, M., Ecological Indicators (2016).Google Scholar
Davis, L.E., Knopman, D., Greenberg, M.D., Miller, L.E., and Doll, A., Choosing a New Organization for Management and Disposition of Commercial and Defense High-Level Radioactive Materials (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2012).Google Scholar
Flynn, J., Kasperson, R., Kunreuther, H., and Slovic, P., Issues in Science and Technology 8, 42 (1992).Google Scholar