Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T15:16:21.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of a Refractory Hexagonal Closed Packed High Entropy Alloy Based on Thin Film Screening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2019

Azin Akbari
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky, 177 F. Paul Anderson Tower, Lexington, KY40506, USA
T. John Balk*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky, 177 F. Paul Anderson Tower, Lexington, KY40506, USA
*
Get access

Abstract

In order to identify candidate high entropy alloys (HEAs) that have the hexagonal closed packed crystal structure, gradient thin films in the OsRuWMoRe system were deposited by sputtering from multiple elemental targets onto Si substrates. In addition to having compositional gradients, the films exhibited regions with different phases, some of which were single-phase and non-equiatomic. Such alloys have the potential to exhibit properties superior to the primarily equiatomic HEAs that have been the focus of most work in this area. To screen the phases that exist across the thin film gradient samples, a range of characterization techniques were employed, including focused ion beam and scanning electron microscopy, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and electron backscattered diffraction analysis. The combinatorial method described in this study enabled the identification of a candidate single-phase HEA that was subsequently fabricated as a bulk alloy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

Yeh, B. J., Chen, S., Lin, S., Gan, J., Chin, T., Shun, T., and T sau, C., Adv. Eng. Mater. 6,299-303 (2004).10.1002/adem.200300567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, B., Chang, I. T. H., Knight, P., and Vincent, A. J. B., Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 375, 213-218 (2004).10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozak, R., Sologubenko, A., and Steurer, W., Zeitschrift fur Kristallographie 230, 55-68 (2015).Google Scholar
Miracle, D. B. and Senkov, O. N., Acta Mater. 122,44 8-511 (2016).10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi, A., Amiya, K., Wada, T., Yubuta, K., and Zhang, W.. JOM 66, 1984-1992 (2014).10.1007/s11837-014-1085-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senkov, O. N., Isheim, D., Seidman, D. N. and Pilchak, A. L., Entropy 18,102 (2016).10.3390/e18030102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, M. C., Zhang, B., Guo, S. M., Qiao, J. W. and Hawk, J. A., Metall. and Mat. Trans. A 47,3322-3332 (2016).10.1007/s11661-015-3091-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartzentruber, P. D., Detisch, M. J. and Balk, T. J., J. of Vacuum Sci. & T ech. A 33, 021405.1-7 (2015).Google Scholar