Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:59:09.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavior of Graphite and Graphene under Mechanochemical Activation with Hematite and Magnetite Nanoparticles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2018

Monica Sorescu  and
Mark Allwes
Monica Sorescu*
Affiliation:
Duquesne University, Department of Physics, Fisher Hall, Pittsburgh, PA15282
Mark Allwes
Affiliation:
Duquesne University, Department of Physics, Fisher Hall, Pittsburgh, PA15282
*
*(Email: sorescu@duq.edu)
Get access

Abstract

Equimolar mixtures of graphene and iron oxide nanoparticles were subjected to mechanochemical activation. The phase sequence was investigated using Mӧssbauer spectroscopy as function of ball milling time. For low milling times (2-4 hours) the series with hematite (Fe2O3) nanoparticles was fitted with 2 sextets, corresponding to hematite with carbon introduced in the lattice. At high milling times (8-12 hours) the same series exhibited an additional sextet with hyperfine parameters characteristic to iron carbides and a quadrupole-split doublet, which could be assigned to carbon clusters with small amounts of iron in them. The series with magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4) at low milling times was analyzed considering 2 sextets, corresponding to the tetrahedral and octahedral sites of magnetite. At high milling times, the magnetite series also exhibited a broad sextet representing iron carbides and the doublet associated with iron-containing carbon clusters. Supporting information was obtained by determinations of the recoilless fraction. The results were compared with those obtained by ball milling graphite with hematite and magnetite nanoparticles.

Keywords

magnetic propertiesmechanical alloyingMӧssbauer effect
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 4 , Issue 3-4: Nanomaterials , 2019 , pp. 155 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Lee, C., Jo, E.H., Kim, S.K., Choi, J.H., Chang, H., Jang, H.D., Carbon 115, 331 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, X., Chang, D.W., Chen, X., Baek, J.B., Dai, L., Curr. Op. Chem. Eng. 11, 52 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, M., Shao, D., Lu, F., Sun, X., Sun, H., Hu, T., Yang, G., Sawyer, S., Qiu, H., Lian, J., Elec. Comm. 34, 312 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahimbi, H., Hong, S.B., Yang, M.H., Choi, B.G., J. Electran. Chem. 786, 14 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiphaneendra, B., Saxena, J., Singh, S.A., Madras, G., Srivastava, C., J. Env. Chem. Eng. 5, 26 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lujaniene, G., Semcuk, S., Lecinskyte, A., Kulakauskaite, I., Mazeika, K., Valiulis, D., Pakstas, V., Skapas, M., Tumenas, S., J. Env. Rad. 166, 166 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C., Liu, X., Tan, J., Wang, Q., Wen, H., Zhang, C., J. Pow. Sour. 342, 157 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermisoglou, E.C., Devlin, E., Giannakopoulou, T., Romanos, G., Boukos, N., Psycharis, V., Lei, C., Lekakou, C., Petridis, D., Trapalis, C., J. Alloys. & Comp. 590, 102 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorescu, M., Mat. Lett. 54, 256 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, J.B., Cat. Lett. 7, 61 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorescu, M., Trotta, R., Metall & Mat Trans A 47, 1404 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar