Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:07:39.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical Mechanical Surface Nano-Structuring (CMNS) Implementation on Titanium Based Implants to Enhance Corrosion Resistance and Control Biocompatibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2020

Kimberly Beers ,
Debashish Sur Open the ORCID record for Debashish Sur [Opens in a new window]  and
G. Bahar Basim
Kimberly Beers
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL32611
Debashish Sur
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL32611
G. Bahar Basim
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL32611
Get access

Abstract

Titanium is the metal of choice for many implantable devices including dental prostheses, orthopaedic devices and cardiac pacemakers. Titanium and its alloys are favoured for hard tissue replacement because of their high strength to density ratio providing excellent mechanical properties and biocompatible surface characteristics promoting in-vivo passivation due to spontaneous formation of a native protective oxide layer in the presence of an oxidizer. This study focuses on the development of a three-dimensional chemical, mechanical, surface nano-structuring (CMNS) process to induce smoothness or controlled nano-roughness on the bio-implant surfaces, particularly for applications in dental implants. CMNS is an extension of the chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process. CMP is utilized in microelectronics manufacturing for planarizing the wafer surfaces to enable photolithography and multilayer metallization. In biomaterials applications, the same approach can be utilized to induce controlled surface nanostructure on three-dimensional implantable objects to promote or demote cell attachment. As a synergistic method of nano-structuring on the implant surfaces, CMNS also makes the titanium surface more adaptable for the bio-compatible coatings as well as the cell and tissue growth as demonstrated by the electrochemical and surface wettability evaluations on implants prepared by DI-water machining versus oil based machining.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 5 , Issue 43: Nanoscale and Quantum Materials , 2020 , pp. 2209 - 2219
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Staruch, R., Griffin, M., and Butler, P., “Nanoscale Surface Modifications of Orthopaedic Implants: State of the Art and Perspectives,” Open Orthop. J., 2017, doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010920.Google Scholar
Ozdemir, Z., Ozdemir, A., and Basim, G. B., “Application of chemical mechanical polishing process on titanium based implants,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozdemir, Z. and Basim, G. B., “Effect of chemical mechanical polishing on surface nature of titanium implants FT-IR and wettability data of titanium implants surface after chemical mechanical polishing implementation,” Data Br., 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.065.Google Scholar
Rabinovich, Y. I., Adler, J. J., Ata, A., Singh, R. K., and Moudgil, B. M., “Adhesion between Nanoscale Rough Surfaces,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2000, doi: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7168.Google Scholar
Stafford, G. L., Chambrone, L., Shibli, J. A., Mercúrio, C. E., Cardoso, B., and Preshaw, P. M., “Review found little difference between sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) dental implants and modified surface (SLActive) implants,” Evidence-Based Dentistry. 2014, doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401047.Google Scholar
Lüers, S., Seitz, C., Laub, M., and Jennissen, H. P., “Contact angle measurement on dental implants,” Biomed. Tech., vol. 59, no. January 2014, pp. S91–S94, 2014, doi: 10.1515/bmt-2014-4042.Google Scholar
Cochran, D. L., Schenk, R. K., Lussi, A., Higginbottom, F. L., and Buser, D., “Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1998, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q.3.0.CO;2-Q.>Google Scholar
Delgado-Ruiz, R. and Romanos, G., “Potential causes of titanium particle and ion release in implant dentistry: A systematic review,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijms19113585.Google Scholar
“Rhenus FS 750,” Rhenus Lub GmbH Co KG, Mönchengladbach, Ger., vol. 2006, no. 1907, pp. 1–13, 2015.Google Scholar
Basim, G.B., Bebek, O., “The Method of Processing Multidimensional Objects Using Chemical And Mechanical Polishing Method and Configuration of Robotic Arm Employed in Realizing This Method” PCT Patent Office Application No: PCT/TR2014/000530, Application Date 31.12.2014.Google Scholar
Basim, G.B., Ozdemir, Z., "Chemical mechanical polishing implementation on dental implants," IEEE Xplore, 2015 International Conference on Planarization/CMP Technology (ICPT), Chandler, AZ, 2015, pp. 1-4.Google Scholar
Kokubo, T. and Takadama, H., “How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?,” Biomaterials, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017.Google Scholar
Zareidoost, Amir et al. . “The relationship of surface roughness and cell response of chemical surface modification of titanium.” Journal of Material Science. Materials in Medicine. vol. 23,6 2012, pp. 1479-88. doi:10.1007/s10856-012-4611-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sowa, M. and Simka, W., “Electrochemical impedance and polarization corrosion studies of tantalum surface modified by DC Plasma electrolytic oxidation,” Materials (Basel)., 2018, doi: 10.3390/ma11040545.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, D. C. et al. , “Titanium corrosion mechanisms in the oral environment: A retrieval study,” Materials (Basel)., 2013, doi: 10.3390/ma6115258.Google Scholar
Al Otaibi, A., Sherif, E. S. M., Al-Rifaiy, M. Q., Zinelis, S., and Al Jabbari, Y. S., “Corrosion resistance of coupled sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) and anodized Ti implant surfaces in synthetic saliva,” Clin. Exp. Dent. Res., 2019, doi: 10.1002/cre2.198.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, D. A., Guida, L., Sridhar, S., Valderrama, P., Wilson, T. G., and Rodrigues, D. C., “Evaluation of oral microbial corrosion on the surface degradation of dental implant materials,” J. Periodontol., 2019, doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0110.Google Scholar
Hayashi, R. et al. , “Hydrocarbon deposition attenuates osteoblast activity on titanium,” J. Dent. Res., 2014, doi: 10.1177/0022034514536578.Google Scholar