Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:15:39.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Study of Chinese Eschatology - Le Taoïsme du Mao Chan. Chronique d'une révélation. By Michel Strickmann. Presses Universitaires de France: Paris, 1981. Pp. 278. - Hua-yen Buddhism: The Jewel Net of Indra. By Francis H. Cook. The Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park and London, 1977. Pp. xiv, 146. - The Renewal of Buddhism in China: Chu-hung and the Late Ming Synthesis. By Chün-fang Yü. Columbia University Press: New York and Guildford, Surrey, 1981. Pp. xviii, 353. - To Acquire Wisdom: The Way of Wang Yang-ming. By Julia Ching. Columbia University Press: New York and London, 1976. Pp. xxviii, 373. - ‘Rebellion in Nineteenth-century China’, Michigan Papers in Chinese Studies, 21. By Albert Feuerwerker. Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, 1975. Pp. viii, 101. - Shantung Rebellion: The Wang Lun uprising of 1774. By Susan Naquin. Yale University Press: New Haven and London, 1981. Pp. xviii, 228. - Rebels and Revolutionaries in North China 1845–1945. By Elizabeth J. Perry. Stanford University Press: Stanford, California, 1980. Pp. xvi, 324. - Primitive Revolutionaries of China. By Fei-ling Davis. The University Press of Hawaii: Honolulu, 1977. Pp. viii, 254.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

T. H. Barrett
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Far Eastern Economic Review (2 July 1976), p. 20.Google Scholar

2 See e.g. p. 485 of Domes, Jürgen, The “Gang of Four” and Hua Kuo-feng: Analysis of Political Events in 1975–76’, China Quarterly, 71, pp. 473–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 I am indebted for this information to Tony Saich.

4 See Religion in the People's Republic of China, Documentation 5 (May 1981), pp. 37, 47–9.Google Scholar

5 See the English-language booklet ‘Mahikari’ (n.p., n.d.), p. 28, and cf. Strickman, , p. 215 and n. 395, p. 275.Google Scholar

6 Translated into English as China and the Search for Happiness (New York, 1971).Google Scholar

7 ‘Time and Eastern Man’, reprinted in The Grand Titration (London, 1969), pp. 218–98.Google ScholarPubMed

8 For example, the progressive Three Ages conception of history espoused by Ho Hsiu (129–82), described by Needham, on pp. 261–2Google Scholar (see preceding note), is explained by Inaba Ichirō as an ideological exercise on behalf of the Han dynasty under which Ho lived. See his ‘Shunjū Kōyōden no rekishi tetsugaku’, Shirin, 50.3 (April 1967), pp. 64–109Google Scholar, and note especially his contention (n. 11, p. 75) that the interpretation of the Three Ages as expressing an idea of progress in the Western sense does not antedate Western influence in the nineteenth century.

9 See e.g. p. 189b of de la Vallée Poussin, L., ‘Ages of the World (Buddhist)’, in Hastings, J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, vol. I (Edinburgh, 1908), pp. 187–90.Google Scholar

10 See Bauer, , Search for Happiness, pp. 15–16, 22–3, and n. 44, pp. 429–30Google Scholar; Modern Asian Studies, 12.2 (April 1978), p. 340, n. 36.Google Scholar

11 On Hsi-wang Mu, see Loewe, M. A. N., Ways to Paradise (London, 1979), pp. 98101Google Scholar; on the Yellow Turbans see Needham, , ‘Time and Eastern Man’, pp. 262–3 and the works cited there.Google Scholar

12 Cf. the observations of Stanley Weinstein on p. 274 of Wright, A. F. and Twitchett, D. C. (eds), Perspectives on the Tang (New Haven and London, 1973), and also Yü, p. 139.Google Scholar

13 Note the opening words of the Mo-ho chih-kuan, one of the principal texts of the school, as reprinted in Taishō shinshū Daizōkyō, vol. 46, p. 1.Google Scholar

14 See e.g. Suzuki, D. T., Studies in the Lankavatara Sutra (London, 1930), p. 57, quoting a preface dated 1085.Google Scholar

15 Though it does provide a better introduction to Hua-yen ideas than the work mentioned in its preface. See for a more detailed review of Cook's approach to Hua-yen thought Unno, T., in Journal of Asian Studies, 38.1 (1978), pp. 163–5.Google Scholar

16 Cook cites Kamata's Chūgoku Bukkyō shisōshi kenkyū (Tokyo, 1968), pp. 313–14, 349–50, 272–4, 279.Google Scholar See n. 5 on p. 263 for some references to earlier Japanese work in this area, and also pp. 279–87.

17 Note the remarks of Terada Tōru in the Nihon Shisō Taikei edition of Dōgen, vol. II, p. 550.Google Scholar

18 Han-shan ta-shih meng-yu ch'üan-chi, 32, p. 33b, in the edition of Dainihon zoku zōkyō, 2A 32/3.Google Scholar

19 E.g. ibid., 6, p. 141b; 20, p. 248a. This aspect of Te-ch'ing's thought would not appear to be treated in the existing secondary literature on him.

20 ibid., 50, pp. 456b, 465b; 52, p. 470a.

21 ibid., 27, pp. 298a, 300a, 301b; 28, pp. 305a, 307b.

22 ibid., 14, p. 198a.

23 This text was printed in 1653 as part of the ‘Ching-shan’ canon, and is available in reproduction in the series Chung-hua la-tsang-ching, series 2 (Taipei, 1968), vol. 79. The preface, by Ou-i Chih-hsü, gives some details concerning Pao's interests and friendships.Google Scholar

24 T'ien-yüeh ming-k'ung chi, 1.23b–25a.

25 ibid., 2.12b, 13a.

26 ibid., 1.25b–26a.

27 These similarities did not go unobserved, leading some critics to assert that Confucianism had simply borrowed the idea of an orthodox line from Ch'an. But the origins of the concept in Confucianism, as I hope to show in a forthcoming study of Buddhist influence on T'ang Confucianism, must be sought in a slightly different quarter.

28 Han-shan ta-shih meng-yu ch'uan-chi, 27, p. 298a.Google Scholar

29 Tzu-po tsun-che ch'üan-chi, 7, p. 378a and 13, p. 432a, in the edition of Dainihon zoku zōkyō, 2A 31/4. Both of these would appear to be merely passing references.

30 I have only found one reference to the decline of Buddhism (not explicitly to mo-fa) amongst the Buddhist works in his Fm-shu, 4 (Peking, 1975), p. 166.Google Scholar

31 On the Confucianization of Buddhism note the source quoted by Yü, p. 170, and cf. the recent study of Pi-lai, Chang, Hung-lou jo-ying (Shanghai, 1979), pp. 5281, 112–16.Google Scholar

32 T'ien-yüeh ming-k'ung chi, 3·9a.

33 Bauer, , Search for Happiness, pp. 256–7Google Scholar; Mu, Ch'ien, Chung-kuo chin san-pai-nien hsüeh-shu shih (Shanghai, 1948), pp. 552–3.Google Scholar

34 Though existing secondary studies on Kung and Buddhism have approached the topic in a way which ignores this.

35 See his Kung Tzu-chen ch'üan-chi (Shanghai, 1975), p. 392; pp. 458, 577, etc.Google Scholar

36 Ibid., p. 512 (I-hai tsa-shih, no. 39), p. 578.

37 ibid., p. 564, and cf. Mizuho, Sawada, Kōchū Haja Shōben (Tokyo, 1972), p. 67.Google Scholar

38 Ibid., pp. 445, 518 (I-hai tsa-shih, no. 98), 524 (I-hai tsa-shih, no. 151).

39 But note that his work contains apparent prophecies of doom even at a stage when Kung should have been looking forward to a successful career. Cf. Wong, Shirleen S., Kung Tzu-chen (Boston, 1975), p. 28.Google Scholar

40 Curwen, C. A., Taiping Rebel (Cambridge, 1977).Google Scholar

41 Faure, David, ‘Secret Societies, Heretic Sects and Peasant Rebellions in Nineteenth Century China’, Journal of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, 5.1 (1979), pp. 189206.Google Scholar

42 The former two-volume collection (henceafter KYCS), edited by a research team in Ch'ing history at Chung-kuo jen-min ta-hsüeh, was published in Peking in 1979; the latter work (hereafter PCCT), of which only the first and second of the other volumes would appear to be available at the time of writing, is edited by a similar research team at the Academy of Social Sciences, and published in Soochow: volume 5 appeared in 1981.

43 Chuang, ‘Ch'ing Shih-tsung chin-chiao k'ao’, Ta-lu tsa-chih, 62.6 (07, 1981), pp. 2636. Hereafter Chuang, 1981.Google Scholar

44 PCCT, pp. 32, 41.Google Scholar

45 PCCT, pp. 28, 115.Google Scholar

46 PCCT, p. 151.Google Scholar

47 Chüsei, Suzuki, Chügokushi ni okeru kakumei to shükyö (Tokyo, 1974), pp. 129–30.Google Scholar

48 KYCS, p. 696.Google Scholar

49 ‘Worshipers and Warriors: White Lotus Influence on the Nian Rebellion’, Modern China, 2.1 (01, 1976), pp. 422.Google Scholar

50 Cf. Prip-Møller, J., Chinese Buddhist Monasteries (second edn, Hong Kong, 1967), pp. 1620.Google Scholar

51 On this revolt see Overmyer, D. L., Folk Buddhist Religion (Harvard U.P., 1976), pp. 120–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and KYCS, pp. 648–53.Google Scholar

52 See e.g. Overmyer, D. L., ‘Boatmen and Buddhas’, History of Religions, 17.3–4 (0205, 1978), pp. 284302.Google Scholar

53 KYCS, pp. 640–8.Google Scholar

54 KYCS, pp. 641, 647; p. 644.Google Scholar

55 KYCS, p. 645.Google Scholar

56 ‘Ts'ung Kuo-li ku-kung Po-wu-yüan tien tsang Ch'ing-tai tang-an t'an T'ien-ti Hui ti yüan-liu’, Ku-kung chi-k'an, 14.4 (Summer, 1980), pp. 6391.Google Scholar

57 See the remarks of M. Strickmann on pp. 243–8 of Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 40.1 (1980).

58 Note that one leader of the West China uprising is described as Cantonese (PCCT, p. 50), though it is unclear whether he brought his beliefs from his native province.

59 Cf. her remarks in Millenarian Rebellion in China (Yale U.P., 1976), pp. 4953.Google Scholar

60 Chuang, , 1981, p. 31Google Scholar; cf. Naquin, , Millenarian Rebellion, pp. 48–9.Google Scholar

61 See in particular Chuang, , 1981, pp. 27–8, 30.Google Scholar

62 Chuang, , 1981, p. 27Google Scholar; cf. Modern Asian Studies 12.2 (04, 1978), p. 337 at n. 14.Google Scholar

63 KYCS, p. 722.Google Scholar

64 KYCS, pp. 657–8; p. 664.Google Scholar

65 KYCS, p. 688.Google Scholar

66 Chuang, , 1981, p. 32. Paying a fee in return for initiation into a scriptural tradition was a practice with good antecedents in Six Dynasties Taoism.Google Scholar

67 Chuang, , 1981, p. 31Google Scholar; PCCT, pp. 10, 12, 23, 24, 38, 50 etc.Google Scholar, Naquin, , Millenarian Rebellion, p. 49.Google Scholar

68 Chuang, , 1981, p. 28Google Scholar; PCCT, p. 88Google Scholar, Naquin, , Millenarian Rebellion, p. 49.Google Scholar

69 PCCT, pp. 1,5.Google Scholar

70 PCCT, pp. 21, 113; p. 103.Google Scholar

71 Chuang, , 1981, p. 30.Google Scholar

72 Ibid., p. 27.

73 PCCT, pp. 67, 108; 98, 106.Google Scholar

74 PCCT, p. 106.Google Scholar

75 Cf. the extended discussion in Curwen, , Taiping Rebel, pp. 54–7, for an examination of possible factors influencing the production of a written deposition.Google Scholar

76 PCCT, p. 103.Google Scholar

77 PCCT, p. 108.Google Scholar

78 Wei-ming, Chiang, Ch'uan-Hu-Shan Pai-lien Mao ch'i-i tzu-liao chi-lu (Chengtu, 1980), p. 36.Google Scholar

79 KYCS, p. 631.Google Scholar

80 KYCS, p. 634.Google Scholar

81 PCCT, 113.Google Scholar

82 PCCT, pp. 46–7.Google Scholar

83 See especially PCCT, p. 37, and pp. 51, 57–8, etc.Google Scholar

84 Chiang, , Ch'uan-Hu-Shan Pai-lien chiao, pp. 76, 96Google Scholar; PCCT, p. 60.Google Scholar