Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T12:21:36.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan's Doctrines of Muslim Nationalism and National Progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Extract

In the hundred years before 1857, the last vestiges of the crumbling Mughal power in India slowly vanished. When forceful resistance to the British was no longer expedient or possible, the Muslims, who had been the rulers, withdrew into a purposive cultural isolation. Under the leadership of the—‘ulama’ (religious teachers), contacts with the British and Hindus were discouraged and the introduction of new cultural elements into Muslim life was severely eschewed. The result was that while the British were introducing a new administrative system, a new language and a new technology into India, and the Hindus, finally released from Muslim rule, were rapidly adopting the British offerings, the Muslims chose not to participate in the professional, governmental or educational life of the country.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Khan, Sayyid Ahmad, Sirat-i Faridiyya, Delhi, 1864, p. 25.Google Scholar

2 Khan, Sayyid Ahmad, Jam-i Jam, 1840; Intikhab al-Akhawayn, 1841; Jila' al-qulubbi dhikr al-mahbub (biographical sketch of the Prophet Muhammad), 1842; Tuhfa Hasan (Urdu translation of the Tuhfa Ithna cashariyya of Shah al-Aziz al-Dihlawi, a Sunni polemic against the Shica), 1844; Tashil fi Jarr al-Thaqil (trans. of a Persian treatise on mechanics), 1844; Tarjama faysalajat sadr sharqi o sadr maghribi (trans. of civil judgements), 1849; Rah-i sunnat dar radd-i bidcat (on the rejection of innovations), 1850; Silsilat al-muluk (chronology of Indian rulers), 1852; Ta'rikh Dilac-i Bijnawr, 1857.Google Scholar

3 Altaf Husayn, Hali, Hayat-i Jawid, Academy of Punjab Trust, Lahore, 1957, pp. 125236.Google Scholar

4 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, Asbab-i Baghawat-i Hind, Aligarh Muslim University Press, 1960, p. 1.Google Scholar

5 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, Ta'rikh-i sarkashi-i dila' Bijnawr, Lahore, 1962, pp. 448–9.Google Scholar

6 Hali, , op. cit., p. 316;Google Scholar see also Albiruni, A. H.’, Makers of Pakistan and Modern Muslim India, Lahore, 1950, p. 41.Google Scholar

7 Hali, , op. cit., pp. 318–9.Google Scholar

8 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, ‘Hubb-i Watan’, gTahdhib al-Akhlaq, I Rabic II 1294/1877, pp. 98101.Google Scholar

9 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, ‘Intikhab alfaz motto bara-i Tahdhib al-Akhlaq’ in Tahdhib al-Akhlaq, 15 Rabic I 1292/1875, p. 1;Google Scholar see also Maqalat-i Sir Sayyid: Mudamin mutacalliq Tahdhib al-Akhlaq, Lahore, 1962, pp. 52–3.Google Scholar

10 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, ‘Insan wa Haywan’, Tahdhib al-Akhlaq, 5 Jumada II 1279/1862, p. 25;Google Scholar see also Akhlaqi Awr Islahi Mudamin, ed. Mawlana Muhammad, Isma'il, Lahore, 1962, pp. 144–6.Google Scholar

11 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, Akhlaqi Awr Islahi Mudamin, pp. 62–6,172.Google Scholar

12 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, ‘Kin kin cizon men tahdhib cahiye’ in Tahdhib al-Akhlaq, 1 Dhu 'l-Hijja 1277/1870, pp. 13.Google Scholar

13 Sayyid Sulayman, Nadwi, ‘Khilafat awr Hindustan’ in Macarif (Azamgarh), October 1921, pp. 133–99;Google ScholarSharir, cAbd al-Halim, Ta'rikh-i Khilafat, Lucknow, 1928, pp. 1519;Google ScholarAzad, Abu 'l-Kalam, Mas'ala-i Khilafat wa Jazira-i cArab, Lahore, n.d., pp. 1015;Google ScholarArnold, T. W., The Caliphate, Oxford, 1924, pp. 6077.Google Scholar

14 For a brief biographical sketch of Taj Rida see the scholarly article of Khan, Agha Abdus Sattar, ‘Taj Rezah’, in Islamic Culture, XIV (1940), pp. 359–66.Google Scholar

15 Sayyid Sabah, al-Din cAbd al-Rahman, Bazm-i Mamlukiyya, Azamgarh, 1955, pp. 101–9, 141–3.Google Scholar

16 For the above development of secular Muslim nationalism, as the aftermath of the Caliphate, see also Malik, Hafeez, Moslem Nationalism in India and Pakistan, Washington, D.C., 1963, Ch. 9.Google Scholar

17 Jinnah, M. A., Letters of Iqbal to Jinnah, Lahore, 1956, pp. 1820;Google Scholar'Ashq Husayn, Batalvi, Iqbal ke, akhiri do sal, Karachi, 1961, p. 521 ff.Google Scholar

18 Ali, Rahmat, What Does the Pakistan National Movement Stand For? Cambridge, 1933.Google Scholar

19 Khaldun, Ibn, The Muqaddima, trans. Rosenthal, Franz, New York, 1958, p. 393 and fn. 225.Google Scholar

20 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, ‘Khilafat awr Khalifa’ in Madhhabi wa Islami Mudamin, Lahore, 1962, pp. 164–8. Before Sir Sayyid the historian Maqrizi (d. 1441) had revived the doctrine that with the rise of the Umayyads the Caliphate had become a kingdom of violence and tyranny;Google Scholar see Quatremère's, M. translation of his work as Histoire des Sultans Mamlouks de l'Égypte, Paris, 1837, I, p. 76.Google Scholar

21 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, Madhhabi wa Islami Mudamin, pp. 157–8.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., p. 161.

23 Ahmad, Muzaffar, The Communist Party of India and its Formation Abroad, Calcutta, 1962, pp. 1197.Google Scholar

24 Abu'l-Kalam, AzadAbul-Kalam Azad (18881958), who was the leader of the Nationalist Muslims, had accepted the political philosophy of the Congress. For his role in the Caliphate Movement, see Hafeez Malik, ‘Abul Kalam Azad's Theory of Nationalism’, in Muslim World, January 1963.Google Scholar

25 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, ‘Ek mucazzaz Angrez ke ham’ in Maktubat-i Sir Sayyid, Lahore, 1959, p. 187.Google Scholar

26 Khan, Sayyid Ahmad, Musafiran-i Landan, ed. Ismacil, Shaykh Muhammad, Lahore, 1961, pp. 132–42.Google Scholar

27 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, Akhbar Scientific Society, Aligarh, 5 May 1876, p. 1.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., pp. 1–2.

29 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, ‘Na-muhadhdhab mulk awr na-muhadhdhab gawrnmant’ in Tahahib al-Akhlaq, 1 I Ramadan 1292/1875, p. 145;Google Scholar see also Maqalat-i Sir Sayyid: Mulk wa Siyasi Mudmin, Lahore, 1962, pp. 12.Google Scholar

30 Ibid. p. 10.

31 The four schools of fiqh are: (I) the Hanafi, founded by Imam Abu Hanifa, d. 767; (2) the Maliki, established by Malik b. Ailas, d. 79 (3) the Shafici, created by Muhammad b. Idris al-Shafici, d. 820; and (4) the Hanbali, founded by Ahmad b. Hanbal, d. 855.Google Scholar

32 The concept of diffusion was discussed towards the end of the nineteenth century, although it has been since refined. Clarke Wissler, Cf., Man and Culture, New York, 1938, pp. 128–72;Google ScholarDixon, Roland B., The Building of Cultures, New York, 1928, pp. 59106;Google ScholarLinton, Ralph, The Study of Man, New York, 1936, p. 324.Google Scholar

33 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, ‘Tacassub’ in Tahdhib al-Akhlaq, I Shawwal I 287/1870, pp. 12;Google ScholarAkhlaqi awr Islahi Mudamin, pp. 351–2.Google Scholar

34 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, Maqalat-i Sir Sayyid: 'Ilmi wa Tahqiqi Mudamin, ed. Mawlana Muhammad, Isma'il, Lahore, 1962, p. 340.Google Scholar

35 Ibid., p. 347.

36 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, Maqalat-i Sir Sayyid: ‘Ilmi wa Tahqiqi Mudamin, ed. Mawlana Muhammad, Isma'il, Lahore, 1962, p. 348.Google Scholar

37 Ibid., p. 350.

38 Sir Sayyid mentions the following first contenders: (1) Imam cAbd al-Malik b. cAbd al-Aziz, d. 772; (2) Abu Nasr Sacid b.cAruba, d. 773; and (3) Rabic b. Sabbih, d. 777.Google Scholar

39 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, Tahdhib al-Akhlaq, 15 Dhu'l–Qacda 1288/1871.Google ScholarMaqalat-i Sir Sayyid: Mudamin mutacalliq Sawanih wa Siyar, ed. Mawlana Muhammad, Ismacil, Lahore, 1962, p. 213.Google Scholar

40 Ibid., p. 124.

41 Cf. Hitti, Philip K., History of the Arabs, London, 1956, p. 311;Google Scholar see also 'Abd alSalam, Nadwi, Hukma-i-Islam, Azamgarh, 1953, pp. 75, 79.Google Scholar

42 Hitti, , op. cit., p. 310.Google Scholar

43 Ibid., p. 307; De Lacy, O'Leary, Arabic Thought and its Place in History, London, 1958, p. 295.Google Scholar

44 Hitti, pp. 358–9.Google Scholar

45 Sayyid Ahmad, KhanMaqalat-i Sir Sayyid: cIlmil wa Tahqiqi Mudamin, p. 350.Google Scholar

46 Ibid., pp. 351–2.

47 Sayyid Ahmad, KhanMaqalat-i Sir Sayyid: cIlmi wa Tahqiqi Mudamin, p. 356.Google Scholar

48 Heinmann, Edward, History of Economic Doctrines, New York, 1945, pp. 75–6.Google Scholar

49 Smith, Adam, The Wealth of Nations, New York, 1937, p. 80.Google Scholar

50 Sayyid Ahmad, Khan, Maqalal-i Sir Sayyid: Madhhabi wa Islami Mudamin, pp. 277–8.Google Scholar

51 Ibid., p. 260.

52 Cf. Heinmann, , op. cit., pp. 73–4.Google Scholar

53 Holy Qur'an, trans. 'Yusuf 'Ali, Abd Allah, Lahore, n.d., XXVI, 221–6.Google Scholar

54 Cf. footnote 50 above, p. 262.Google Scholar

55 Ibid., p. 269.

56 Cf. footnote 31 above.Google Scholar

57 Cf. footnote 50 above, pp. 273–4.Google Scholar