Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T20:51:05.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Raja and Rank in North Bihar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Carolyn Henning Brown
Carolyn Henning Brown
Affiliation:
Whitman CollegeWalla, Walla, Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Maithil Brahmans of Bihar and the Bengali Brahmans of Bengal, two of the five great North Indian Brahman castes, had, as of the early nineteenth century, closely similar systems of ranked grades and hypergamously marrying lineages. In addition, fundamental concepts—of purity and pollution, of coded substance, of sattva, rajas, and tamas (Dumont 1970; Inden 1976; Davis 1983)—form a shared construction of reality for both groups of Hindus. Yet despite a common ideation and similar patterns of organization up to that point, the ‘Kulin system’ of Bengal virtually disappeared in the middle of the last century, while among the Brahmans to the east in Bihar, the system faltered during the same period, then corrected itself, grew more complex with greater refinements of rank than at any time in the past, and has survived into the present.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 757 - 782
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Brown, Carolyn Henning 1981. Demographic Constraints on Caste: A Fiji Indian Example. American Ethnologist 8, 2: 314–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Carolyn Henning. 1983. The Gift of a Girl: Hierarchical Exchange in North Bihar. Ethnology 22, 1: 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Carolyn Henning. 1983. Substance and Structure among the Maithil Brahmans. The Eastern Anthropologist 36, 3: 197–210.Google Scholar
Davis, Marvin. 1983. Rank and Rivalry: The Politics of Inequality in Rural West Bengal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1970. Homo Hierarchicus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Inden, Ronald B. 1976. Marriage and Rank in Bengali Culture: A History of Caste and Clan in Middle Period Bengal. New Delhi: Vikas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inden, Ronald B. and Nicholas, Ralph W.. 1977. Kinship in Bengali Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jha, Jata Shankar. 1962. History of Darbhanga Raj. Journal of the Bihar Research Society 48, 14–104.Google Scholar
Jha, Ugranath. 1966. The Origin of the Panji System. The Eastern Anthropologist 19, 3: 190–204.Google Scholar
Jha, Ugranath. 1980. The Genealogies and Genealogists of Mithila. Varanasi: Kishor Vidya Niketan.Google Scholar
Majumdar, R. C. 1954. History and Culture of the Indian People. Bombay.Google Scholar
Mayer, Adrian. 1985. The King's Two Thrones. Man 20, 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marriott, McKim and Inden, Ronald. 1977. Toward an Ethnosociology of South Asian Caste Systems. In David, Kenneth A. (ed.), The New Wind: Changing Identities in South Asia. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Yengoyan, Aram. 1968. Demographic and Ecological Influences on Aboriginal Australian Marriage Systems. In Lee, Richard B. and DeVore, Irven (eds), Man the Hunter. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar