Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T21:31:00.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growing Mountain, Shrinking Mouse? Indian Poverty and British Bilateral Aid

I. Introduction and Summary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Michael Lipton
Affiliation:
Sussex University

Extract

In the book compiled by Mervyn Jones after Kingsley Martin's death in 1969, Asa Briggs recalled that ‘no country meant more to Kingsley Martin than India’. Martin's writing, campaigning and travelling all confirm this. His life also confirms his priorities for development and poverty reduction. Famously, however, he was not an economist, and he does not seem to have brought these concerns together, or to have asked how aid might best be used to help. This paper, in a small way, aims to fill that gap.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baum, W. 1978. ‘The World Bank project cycle’. Finance and Development 15, 4, 12Google Scholar
Basu, K. 1991. ‘Budget in time of change: reflections on restructuring’. Economic and Political Weekly, 31 08Google Scholar
Basu, K. 1991. ‘Structural reform in India, 1991–1993: experience and agenda’. Economic and Political Weekly, 27 11: 2599–605.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. and Srinivasan, T. N. 1993. ‘India's economic reforms’. Paper commissioned by Government of India. Mimeo, New Delhi: July.Google Scholar
Binswanger, H., Deininger, K. and Feder, G. 1995. ‘Power, distortions, revolt and reform in agricultural land relations’. In Srinivasan, T. N. and Behrman, J., eds. Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 3, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Cassen, R. H. (ed.). 1995. India: The Future of Economic Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chaudhri, D. 1974. Effect of Farmers' Education on Agricultural Productivity and Employment. Armidale: University of New England.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. et al. , 1993. ODA Evaluation Report EV 475: Hyderabad Slum Improvement Project. London: Overseas Development Administration.Google Scholar
Donaldson, D. J., Currie, J. and Groves, J. 1993. ODA Evaluation Report EV 493: India-UAE Submarine Telephone Cable. London: ODA.Google Scholar
EPW Foundation. 1993. ‘Poverty levels in India: norms, estimates and trends’. Economic and Political Weekly, 21 08: 1748–68.Google Scholar
Harriss, B. 1991. ‘The intrafamily distribution of hunger in South Asia’. In The Political Economy of Hunger, vol. 1, ed. Drèze, J. and Sen, A. K.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
GoI (Government of India). 1992. Report on Currency and Finance 1991–2. Bombay: Reserve Bank of India.Google Scholar
GoI (Government of India). 1994. Economic Survey 1993–94. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar
Gulati, A. and Pursell, G. 1995. ‘Liberalising Indian agriculture: an agenda for reform’. In [Cassen, 1995].Google Scholar
IGBA (Independent Group on British Aid). 1994. ‘The future of British bilateral aid’. Mimeo, London: Symposium paper. 25 March.Google Scholar
Jalan, J. and Subbarao, K. 1993. ‘Adjustment and social sectors in India’. In [Cassen, 1995].Google Scholar
Jamison, D. and Lau, L. 1982. Farmer Education and Farm Efficiency. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
Joshi, V. and Little, I. M. D. 1993. ‘Macro-economic stabilization in India, 1991–93 and beyond’. Economic and Political Weekly, 4 12 2659–65.Google Scholar
Lipton, M. 1985. ‘Indian agricultural development and African food strategies: a role for EEC?’ In EEC India: Towards a Common Perspective, ed. Callewaart, W. M. and Kumar, R.. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Lipton, M.. 1993. ‘Land reform as commenced business: the case for not stopping’. World Development, 05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, M.. 1994. ‘Two concepts of reform: can liberalization help the poor?’ Asian Development Review. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Lipton, M. 1995. ‘Liberalization, poverty reduction and agricultural development in India’. In [Cassen, 1995].Google Scholar
Lipton, M. and Maxwell, S. 1992. ‘The new poverty agenda: an overview’. Mimeo, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Lipton, M. and Ravallion, M. 1995. ‘Poverty and policy’. In Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 3, ed. Srinivasan, T. N. and Behrman, J.. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Lipton, M. and Toye, J. 1990. Does Aid Work in India? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manor, J. 1995. ‘The political sustainability of economic liberalization in India’. In [Cassen, 1995].Google Scholar
Mellor, J. and Desai, G. (eds). 1985. Agricultural Development and Rural Poverty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
Minhas, B. S., Jain, L. D. and Tendulkar, S. D. 1991. ‘Declining incidence of poverty in the 1980s: evidence versus artefacts’. Economic and Political Weekly, 6–13 07: 1673–82.Google Scholar
ODA (Overseas Development Administration, UK). 1993, 1992, 1990, 1988. British Aid Statistics 1988/89–1992/93, 1987/88–1991/1993, 1985–1989 and 1983–1987. London: Govt. Statistical Services/ODA.Google Scholar
OECD (Development Assistance Committee). 1994. Development Co-operation 1994. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Parikh, K. 1993. ‘Economic reforms and food and agricultural policy’. Mimeo, Ahmedabad: Indira Gandhi Institute.Google Scholar
Ravallion, M., Datt, G. and van, der Walle D. 1991. ‘Quantifying absolute poverty in the developing world’. Review of Income and Wealth 37, 345–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNDP. 1992, 1993, 1994. Human Development Report 1992, 1993, 1994. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. 1992. ‘The Washington consensus’. Mimeo: Seminar paper. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1989. India: Poverty, Employment and Social Services. Report no. 7617-IN, vol. 1. New Delhi: Resident Mission in India. 10 03.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1990. World Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1992. Poverty Handbook. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar