Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:45:24.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shape analysis of moldavites and their impact origin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

J. Konta
J. Konta*
Affiliation:
Department of Petrology, Charles University, Praha, Czechoslovakia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

1666 moldavites from 19 localities in Bohemia and 617 moldavites from 10 localities in Moravia were measured to yield parameters L (length), B (breadth), and T (thickness). A digital computer was programmed to calculate values T/L, (L-B)/(L-T), and according to Sneed and Folk (1958) and values q = B/L, p = T/B, and F = p/q according to Zingg (1935). Averages of large numbers of values characterize Bohemian and Moravian localities. Moldavites from most localities in Bohemia are often drop-like, flat or elongate with average values of between 0·53 and 0·66 and F between 0·68 and 0·91. Moldavites from Moravia are frequently massive to spheroidal with average in the range 0·60 to 0·75 and F between 0·87 and 1·08. Among the localities in Bohemia, four have moldavites with morphological features of Moravian moldavites. The data obtained permit an interpretation that localities of moldavites with low average sphericity contain less heated material. Less heated and thus more viscous glass could have flown along shorter trajectories (Bohemia). More heated glass was ejected to geographically more distant places (Moravia) or travelled along relatively long steeper trajectories (several localities in Bohemia).

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 38 , Issue 296 , December 1971 , pp. 408 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, (V.E.), 1964. Geochimica Acta, 28,893–913 [M.A. 17-61].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, (V.E.), 1968. Tektites. Reprinted from International Dictionary of Geophysics, 1-12, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bouška (V.), Faul, (H.), and Naeser, (C.W.), 1968. Acta Univ. Carol., ser. geol., No. 4, 277-86.Google Scholar
Konta, (J.), 1966. Ibid. No. 2, 81-97 [M.A. 19--44].Google Scholar
Konta, (J.), and Mráz (L.), 1969. Geochimica Aeta. 33, 1103-1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krumbein, (W.C.), 1941. [Journ. Sedim. Petr., 11, p. 66]; quoted in Pettijohn, (F.J.), 1949. Sedimentary rocks, on p. 46. New York, Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Sneed, (E.D.) and Folk, (R.L.), 1958. Journ. Geology. 66, 114-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinng, (Th.), 1935. Sehweiz. Min. Petr. Mitt.. 15, 39-140.Google Scholar