Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T17:22:43.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A redetermination of the unit-cell geometry of scolecite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

G. W. Smith
Affiliation:
The British Petroleum Co. Ltd. Research Centre, Chertsey Road, Sunbury-on-Thames, Middlesex
R. Walls
Affiliation:
The British Petroleum Co. Ltd. Research Centre, Chertsey Road, Sunbury-on-Thames, Middlesex

Summary

A re-examination of the mineral scolecite has shown that the previously published monoclinic (pseudo-orthorhombic) unit cell is face-centred and that the Hermann-Mauguin spacegroup symbol has been incorrectly assigned. The reduced monoclinic cell yields a 9·85 Å, b 18·98 Å, c 6·52 Å, β 110° 61; space group Aa. New indexed powder data are included.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BRAGG, (Sir L.) and Claringbull, (G.F.), 1965. Crystal Structures of Minerals. London (Bell and Sons). Crystal Data, 2nd edn, A.C.A. Monograph no. 5, 1963.Google Scholar
Hey, (M.H.) and Bannister, (F.A.), 1936. Min. Mag. 24, 227.Google Scholar
Lindquist, (O.) and Wengelin, (F.), 1967. Arkiv Kemi. 28, 179.Google Scholar
Peng, (C.J.), 1955. Amer. Min. 40, 834.Google Scholar
Renninger, (M.), 1937. Zeits. Krist. 97, 107.Google Scholar
Smith, (O.W.), 1962. Acta Cryst. 15, 1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylog, (W.H.), Meek, (C.A.), and JACKSON (W.W.), 1933. Zeits. Krist. 84, 373.Google Scholar
Winchell, (N.H.) and Winchell, (A.N.), 1951. Elements of Optical Mineralogy. 2, 341. 3rd edn. New York (J. Wiley).Google Scholar