Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T19:38:58.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mössbauer spectra of several micas and related minerals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

C. S. Hogg  and
R. E. Meads
C. S. Hogg
Affiliation:
Research Laboratories, English Clays, Lovering Pochin and Co. Ltd.
R. E. Meads
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Exeter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Well-resolved Mössbauer spectra of several dioctahedral and trioctahedral micas have been obtained and subjected to detailed computer analysis. Most of the spectra can be resolved into two ferrous quadrupole doublets and one ferric quadrupole doublet. In dioctahedral micas, ferrous iron is seen to occupy the larger, more symmetric octahedral site in preference to the smaller, less symmetric site, confirming predictions made on the basis of structure alone. In trioctahedral micas there is still a tendency for ferrous iron to occupy preferentially the more symmetric octahedral site even though the two octahedral sites are no longer distinguished by size. A lithium-rich biotite gives a spectrum typical of that expected from a mica with a zinnwaldite structure, but the spectrum of a more authenticated zinnwaldite could not be resolved sufficiently for detailed structural interpretation. The spectra of pyrophyllite and talc give results that can be related to the corresponding micas by considering their respective structural differences. In none of the micas studied was there evidence of ferric iron in tetrahedral coordination. The ferrous: ferric ratios obtained from the Mössbauer spectra do not always agree with the chemical values. In several cases the spectra show more ferrous iron than found chemically. It is suggested that the spectral values are more accurate, oxidation on chemical analysis being the most likely source of error.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 37 , Issue 289 , March 1970 , pp. 606 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: Department of Physics, University of Exeter.

References

Bancroft, (G. M.), Maddock, (A. G.), and Burns, (R. G.), 1967. Geochimica Acta, 31, 2291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bancroft, (G. M.), Burns, (R. G.), and Stone, (A. J.), 1968. Ibid. 32, 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, (L. H.), Weed, (S. B.), and Stevens, (J. G.), 1969. Amer. Min. 54, 72.Google Scholar
Brindley, (G. W.) and Kurtossy, (S. S.), 1961. Ibid. 46, 1205.Google Scholar
Clark, (P. E.), Nichol, (A. W.), and Carlow, (J. S.), 1967. Journ. Sci. Instr. 44, 1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cundy, (E. K.), Windle, (W.), and Warren, (I. H.), 1960. Clay Min. Bull. 4, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnay, (G.), Morimoto, (N.), Takeda, (H.), and Donnay, (J. D. H.), 1964. Acta Cryst. 17, 1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, (R.), 1966. Comm. Assoc. Comp. Mach. 9, 686.Google Scholar
Fluck, (E.), 1964. Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem. 6, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzenberg, (C. L.) and Toms, (D.), 1966. Journ. Geophys. Res. 71, 2661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzenberg, (C. L.), Riley, (D. L.), and Lamoreaux, (R.), 1968. Nature, 219, 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingalls, (R.), 1964, Phys. Rev. 133, A787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malden, (P. J.) and Meads, (R. E.), 1967. Nature, 215, 844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, (H.), DE Coster, (M.), and Amelinckx, (S.), 1962. Phys. Stat. Solid, 2, 1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radoslovich, (E. W.), 1960. Acta Cryst. 13, 919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieder, (M.), 1968. Science, 160, 1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, (G. L.), Ruostala, (A. P.), and Keeling, (R. O.) Jr., 1968. Clay and Clay Minerals, 16, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veitch, (L. G.) and Radoslovich, (E. W.)., 1963. Amer. Min. 48, 62.Google Scholar
Weaver, (C.), Wampler, (J.), and Pecuil, (T.), 1967. Science, 156, 504.Google Scholar