Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T20:03:30.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metal-contaminant leaching from lead smelter fly ash using pH-stat experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

M. Vítková*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Mineral Resources, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic
V. Ettler
Affiliation:
Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Mineral Resources, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic
O. Šebek
Affiliation:
Laboratories of Geological Institutes, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic
M. Mihaljevič
Affiliation:
Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Mineral Resources, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic

Abstract

Fly ash from secondary Pb metallurgy was submitted to the pH-static leaching procedure according to the PrEN 14997 European leaching standard. The 48 h pH-static leaching experiments were performed on (1) fresh untreated fly ash and (2) previously washed fly ash with a cumulative wash step of 60 l kg-1. Greater release ofmetallic contaminants (Pb, Cd, Zn) was observed in the acidic pH range for both ashes. Washing significantly reduced the release of Cd and Zn, but greater concentrations of Pb were observed in leachates from washed fly ash due to the more important leaching of anglesite (PbSO4). The PHREEQC-2 speciation-solubility calculations showed that anglesite, phosgenite (PbCl2·PbCO3) and laurionite (Pb(OH)Cl) are the most important solubility-controlling phases for Pb, which is the most important contaminant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astrup, T., Mosbadt, H. and Christensen, T.H. (2006) Assessment of long-term leaching from waste incineration air-pollution-control residues. Waste Management, 26, 803–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ettler, V., Mihaljevič, M., Sebek, O. and Strnad, L. (2005) Leaching of APC residues from secondary Pb metallurgy using single extraction tests: mineralogical and geochemical approach. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B121, 149–157.Google Scholar
Hyks, I. Astrup, T. and Christensen, T.H. (2007) Influence of test conditions on solubility controlled leaching predictions from air-pollution-control residues. Waste Management Research, 25, 457–466.Google ScholarPubMed
Parkhurst, D.L. and Appelo, C.A.J. (1999) User's Guide to PHREEQC (Version 2) - A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-reaction, One-dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report No. 99–4259, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
PrEN 14997 (2004) Characterization of waste -Leaching behaviour tests — Influence of pH on leaching with continuous pH-control. CEN 2004, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
van der Sloot, H.A., Kosson, D.S. and Hjelmar, O. (2001) Characteristics, treatment and utilization of residues from municipal waste incineration. Waste Management, 21, 753–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed