Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T15:02:25.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Karroo dolerites of southern Malawi and their regional geochemical implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. R. Woolley
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD
J. C. Bevan
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD
C. J. Elliott
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD

Summary

The field relationships, petrography and mineralogy, including probe analyses of olivines, pyroxenes, and plagioclases, of the Karroo dolerite dike swarm of southern Malawi, are described. Rock analyses are given and define a typical tholeiitic trend of iron enrichment. The most magnesian rocks are thought to represent fairly picritic liquids. A number of authors have shown that there are significant geochemical differences between the basaltic rocks of the northern and southern parts of the Karroo outcrop in southern Africa, notably for elements such as Al, P, K, Ti, and Ba. The Malawi data presented here, however, show trends that are the reverse of those found hitherto, the Malawi dolerites being closely comparable with the rocks of the central Karroo basin of South Africa and Basutoland. The striking regional variation in the geochemistry of the Karroo basaltic rocks over southern Africa is independent of the tectonics or position vis-à-vis the central Karroo basin, and so probably reflects mantle heterogeneity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloomfield, (K.), 1958. Bull. Geol. Surv. Nyasaland, 9, 76 pp.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, (K.) 1965. Bull. Geol. Surv. Malawi. 16, 193 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, (G. M.) and Vincent, (E. A.), 1963. J. Petrol. 4, 175-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, (K. G.), 1972. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 128, 311-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, (K. G.) Johnson, (R. L.), Monkman, (L. J.), Stillman, (C. J.), Vail, (J. R.), and Wood, (D. N.), 1965. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., Ser. A. 257, 71-218.Google Scholar
Cox, (K. G.) and Hornung, (G.), 1966. Am. Mineral. 51, 1414-32.Google Scholar
Cox, (K. G.) Macdonald, (R.), and Hornung, (G.), 1967. Am. Mineral. 52, 1451-74.Google Scholar
Eales, (H. V.) and Booth, (P. W. K.), 1974. Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Africa, 77, 1-15.Google Scholar
Garson, (M. S.), 1962. Mere. Geol. Surv. Nyasaland. 2, 248 pp.Google Scholar
Habgood, (F.), 1963. Bull. Geol. Surv. Nyasaland, 14, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Leake, (B. E.), 1968. Geol. Soc. America, Special Paper, 98, 210 pp.Google Scholar
Poldervaart, (A.), 1944. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Africa,. 30, 85-119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, (R. C.) and Krohn, (D. H.), 1972. Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Africa, 75, 11-21.Google Scholar
Vail, (J. R.), Hornung, (G.), and Cox, (K. G.), 1969. Bull. Volcan. 33, 398-418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartiainen, (H.) and Woolley, (A. R.), 1976. Bull. Geol. Surv. Finland, 280, 1-87.Google Scholar
Walker, (F.) and Poldervaart, (A.), 1949. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer. 60, 591-706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, (A. R.) and Garson, (M. S.), 1970. In African Magmatism and Tectonics, eds. Clifford, T. N. and Gass, I. G. (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh), 237-62.Google Scholar